The Instigator
Gulam
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
whatledge
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

The Existence of god cannot be approved nor disapproved.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
whatledge
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/11/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 565 times Debate No: 43758
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Gulam

Pro

This is a casual debate. No evidence needed. For me and the challenger. This is because this is who I am. Once one of the greatest debater in this website told me that I needed evidence and long examples and explanation to compliment it. I just realised that I do not want to research things, I want to just talk my mind out. Putting that aside.
The first and only rule is no stupid corrections. I absolutely hate it when debaters ask for a definition of a word of subject. It is a stupid and time wasting.
Lastly the person who accepts please just use the round to validate your participation on the debate. Round 2,3 and 4 will be used to debate
whatledge

Con

"This is a casual debate. No evidence needed."

Fantastic, I look forward to a spontaneous exchange of ideas.

"For me and the challenger. This is because this is who I am. Once one of the greatest debater in this website told me that I needed evidence and long examples and explanation to compliment it. I just realised that I do not want to research things, I want to just talk my mind out. Putting that aside."

Indeed, let us just talk our minds out. We can afford to indulge in this.

"The first and only rule is no stupid corrections. I absolutely hate it when debaters ask for a definition of a word of subject. It is a stupid and time wasting."

I will not ask for a definition of a word, but I look forward to exploring together what the word may imply in all relevant contexts.

"Lastly the person who accepts please just use the round to validate your participation on the debate. Round 2,3 and 4 will be used to debate"

Very well, then. I look forward to your arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
Gulam

Pro

Gulam forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Gulam

Pro

Gulam forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Gulam

Pro

Gulam forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Cheetah 3 years ago
Cheetah
GulamwhatledgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: "Round 2,3 and 4 will be used to debate" You mean used to forfeit? " I absolutely hate it when debaters ask for a definition of a word of subject. It is a stupid and time wasting." There is a major importance in knowing the definitions. Con wins.
Vote Placed by Josh_b 3 years ago
Josh_b
GulamwhatledgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: con checked on the debate and entered his appearance even though there was no debate.