The Gender Spectrum is nonsensical
Debate Round Forfeited
Doffy has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
|Voting Style:||Open||Point System:||7 Point|
|Updated:||6 months ago||Status:||Debating Period|
|Viewed:||311 times||Debate No:||94391|
Debate Rounds (3)
If gender is a spectrum, i.e. a continuum between two extremes, then everyone would be "Non-binary". Which would make the concept of a "Gender spectrum" redundant and meaningless.
Round 1: Greetings and acceptance; opening.
Round 2: Arguments, rebuttals
Round 3: Rebuttals and closing.
Hello, Doffy, thank you for this debate. I accept the challenge, and would like to add that I personally am not a big fan of the gender spectrum, but as a bit of a brain exercise am accepting the debate anyway. That being said, I do find merit in the general idea of a gender spectrum, but first the distinction must be made between gender and sex.
Gender- the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women. 
Sex- the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women. 
From here I'd like to start our debate by asking my opponent a simple question.
Suppose that there are three members of the same sex (we'll go with male). we can call them Bob, Joe, and Tom. Is it possible that Bob is more masculine than Joe, and Joe is more masculine than Tom? Likewise, is it possible that Tom is more feminine than Joe, and Joe more feminine than Bob?
To answer your question, I say no, a man who possesses less masculine traits does not really mean that he possesses more feminine traits; same thing with feminine traits. It could be that there could be certain intensities of a masculine/feminine personality.
If a masculine personality would be related to strength and dominant, someone who is slightly weaker and less aggressive than another does not mean that the weaker individual is more feminine.
In Round 2, Pro concedes a key point in this debate that is very important when deciding the victor.
"... a man who possesses less masculine traits does not really mean that he possesses more feminine traits; same thing with feminine traits. It could be that there could be certain intensities of a masculine/feminine personality."
This is exactly what the gender spectrum is about. Just because a man possesses more masculine traits doesn't make him less feminine than another man. However, it does make him more masculine. Therefore, there is some sort of disparity in masculinity levels in males, meaning some can be hyper-masculine, while others are very non-masculine.
Men can also be feminine, as they may enjoy things that society has deemed more likely to be associated with females. The same male that can be hyper-masculine can also enjoy things such as wearing makeup, fashion, and "chick flicks." These are all things associated more often with the female sex, but remember, sex and gender are different.
Therefore, as people can be more masculine/feminine than one another, a gender spectrum exists. However, I'd actually argue that two exist independent of one another. Though increased masculinity would likely correspond with decreased femininity and vice versa, an individual can be both hyper-masculine and hyper-feminine.
s://clareflourish.files.wordpress.com...; alt="" />
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click thelink at the top of the page.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.