OK, since it's the first round, let's make this round easy. The reason why I am opposing this motion... is simple. It leads to unbalance of the congress(between parties) or the government itself. For example, Park Jung-Hee, the former president of the Republic of Korea(I am the citizen of that country) made the Yoosin Amendment, which indicates that there is no limits of presidency. This led to some deadly dictatorship society and demos of citizens and students. This instance shows how lethal it would be if you limit the terms of politicians. We should let the term limits of politicians.
Okay... So I don't understand why my opponent is mentioning such racist arguments... It is very dismannered for the opponent to insult me in this debate...
I think the my opponent should elaborate on the issues on the debate, not me... actually.
In this round, I'll not mention my arguments 'til my opponent will mention 'real arguments' on the debate
Thanks for watching this debate online users
P.S. If the opponent writes these kinds of dumb things again in his rounds I'll try to report him
Report me. You won't do it. This debate never started but I'm going to finish it. I'll go out with a bang, just like kamikaze pilots. I never joined this site to debate. My ignorance and your wasted time is my win.