The Instigator
missWiwid
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
johnmichaelsatur
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

The Government will abolish the policy about free schools

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/12/2013 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 640 times Debate No: 40369
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

missWiwid

Pro

free-schools is the one of new government program for the all student who study in government schools. and this is also in conjunction with a new curriculum (curriculum 2013) that is in the country of Indonesia to every government schools. the government should abolish the policy about free schools. why? because the all system from this new policy is getting abstract and will complicated the poor people because although any free school but their children have to get uniform,right? and free school is not include the unifrom, and tools study for them.
johnmichaelsatur

Con

well in behalf on my opponent in this motion, i firmly believe and i stand for my opinion that the government should not abolish the policy or the program for a free education in a public school where education can be attain freely without much paying a high tuition fee, this motion is somehow a multidisciplinary since it may interconnect other aspects ,field and other areas, example given: poverty, economy and etcetera, if this will be abolish many would cry for frustrations since this abolition of a free education program would simply states that, a good quality education can only be attain by those who can paid for a tuition or to be specific wealthy and elite one, we should remember the fact that education is the ticket for a better future as what ms. ariella arida says(miss universe 2013 3rd runner up) a free schools policy is a great much help of a developing economic nation, it is an ingredient for promoting and uplifting an economic status.
Debate Round No. 1
missWiwid

Pro

well, if you mean on the last your argument, that "a free schools policy is a great much help of a developing economic nation, it is an ingredient for promoting and uplifting an economic status". but in actually, free schools will make complicated and will be big problem for poor people. if you have assumption that government shouldn't abolish the free schools, so what the function subsidized early from government? while we know that the subsidize include begin from healthy of their children, happiness their life so that not cry or sad about their daily economic untill education's guarantee for their children also. in the other side, the "free-school" is not include the uniform,right? it's not include the transporation such as how we can go to school for study? it's just for guide-books and school-paid. you can look in the Indonesia if in senior high school we has having only 3 lesson. and that's ridiculous if I just learn history, bahasa and mathematis. how about other lesson? so, the government is not consistent with their early promise. because until right now we don't know when the other guide-books will come meanwhile the teacher always push us to keep have a guide-book in each lesson.
johnmichaelsatur

Con

before anything else i just want to extend my gratitude of responding my argument regarding the motion you have started, going back to what we begin, my question is "how will a free school complicate and contribute to the problem of the poor people? do u really think that implementing the abolition of free school would really lessen the economic problem of the nation? your arguments are somehow impressive for those who did not fully understand it, your arguments are yet skeptical.
i just want to open it up my last post that the " government should not abolish the free schools" it is not an assumption but it is a firm opinion . Free schools is neither a problem nor a hindrance for students yet it is an opportunity and privilege grant for those unfortunate and uneconomically uplifted by the government, i know that you are referring to poverty if that is your concern with , students cannot sent themselves to school due to money matters is not an issue you can go to school even if you don't have money, transportation is not a hindrance, here in the Philippines many children attend school everyday even if they will walk barefooted just not to missed a single lesson taught by the educators, it has something to do with the willingness of the students to have a higher educational attainment, on the other hand if u are concern with the uniform and study tools too, it is not already included in the list of government desires , parent's are the one responsible for it, we should remember that government did not only focus on one side though the government can fund the assistance of uniform, study tools and transportation but how about other areas like program intended for free medical care, agriculture , and industry? simply they will be affected great much. if the government did not do there task as a public servant for the denizens it has something to do with revolting against them , youth have the right to persist what they are doing if the people was not able granted of the benefits promises, you know and i know that you can make a proposal to add lessons and subjects to the commission of education. your arguments are quite good but there are technicalities on it, you should be aware and watch out for that , it may be the cause of your confusion in the motion.
Debate Round No. 2
missWiwid

Pro

the negative impact of free schools policy is the possibility of misappropriation of funds if the lack of strict supervision, as many cases occurred in the country of Indonesia.
The reduction in parental concern for the child's education will no more spending on schools. (tuition / books etc). because most parents assume all been provided by the school. so the parents think the child / student has been able to follow the lessons well and each semester will receive a report card.
Awareness of students / children about school declined
johnmichaelsatur

Con

since this is the last round of our debate rounds, i will going to make it very significant for i am debating an intelligent one,
yes you cannot deny the fact that the negative impact of free school is the existence of the misappropriation of funds if it is then lack of supervision of those authorize security which is very typical as it is happens in your country, but then it will be avoided if it is handed by a reliable person and there is strong strict supervision should be done by the authorize agents am i right? The parents should not assume that all the "needs" and "wants" of the children as it is stipulated in your statement that the government will shoulder all the expenses for their educational needs which includes the uniform and transportation, for this will cause a great adverse effect, it will lead then to a debt in the world bank just to supply what is then need by the students especially if the country is not fast growing one, if that's so i can conclude that your countrymen are parasites aren't they? they want everything to be granted by the government, dependence wont help them to stand for their own but rather they should learn to be independent for their own and for the betterment of your nation, so what is then the purpose of salary receive by the parents monthly ? is it not intended for the educational needs of their children? in my last word i just want to label that government should not abolish the policy for free school , it might be annoying to hear by anybody but then it has a role being played to improve ones economic standing , for then it to be achieve a hand in hand agree of this implementation, the probability of this may not be start today but it will be tomorrow.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by missWiwid 3 years ago
missWiwid
well, it's all not about grammar,okay. it sure that government have planning "will" that's why not "should" thank you.
please be understandable that I am Indonesian. I was born in Indonesia and english is not the native language from my country, you know. dear "dudestop", if you just judge the topic, is not make a change!
Posted by johnmichaelsatur 3 years ago
johnmichaelsatur
i think, it has something to do with checking the grammar.....the correct is should.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
Wait, will or should?
No votes have been placed for this debate.