The Instigator
nassif.nicholas
Pro (for)
Losing
31 Points
The Contender
NeenahLibertarian
Con (against)
Winning
34 Points

The Green Bay Packer's will make it to the superbowl in the 2007 NFL Season.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/24/2007 Category: Sports
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,512 times Debate No: 931
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (18)

 

nassif.nicholas

Pro

It'll be Green Bay.
Dallas will lose to the Redskins, giving Green Bay home field advantage in the conference championship.

The Packers will dominate the Cowboys at Lambeau, locking up a trip to the Super Bowl.
NeenahLibertarian

Con

Cowboys locked up home field advantage with the Packers loss and Favre's been playin' like a girl lately, but that doesn't mean they can't do it. My problem with what you say is that you stop at them getting there, which implies that they will lose. The Packers are undefeated vs the Patriots in the superbowl and history doesn't lie, they'll do it again.
Debate Round No. 1
nassif.nicholas

Pro

The end of my first argument Kriha is open-ended so i could be implying that they win. Which i actually was, i just have not had my starbucks yet.
NeenahLibertarian

Con

Well then why didn't you specify that they would win the Superbowl?...by the way, I'm on my way out the door and most likely won't have computer access until tuesday night or wednesday so don't expect my closing argument until then.
Debate Round No. 2
nassif.nicholas

Pro

I didnt have my STARBUCKS!!
You automatically lose.
You dropped my Starbucks argument which was the framework of my case.
Therefore you must lose.
NeenahLibertarian

Con

1) Starbucks was not your framework, it wasn't presented until the second round, thus you shift your position which is abusive because I don't have enough rounds to sufficiently answer such an argument.

2) Your argument is empirically false, you claim the Packers will do it via home field advantage versus the Cowboys in the confrence championship which they will not have based on their loss to the Bears. Thus I am allowed to maintain that they will go to the Superbowl and win while proving you wrong because your means fail.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by bcaldwell100 9 years ago
bcaldwell100
At this point the pro is dominating. The question is only will the Packers get to the superbowl. The con starts his opening case with will the win the superbowl, immediately conceding that they will have gotten there. The con never mends this mistake and therefore as no impact in this round. The Pro also has a separate voter on the starbucks argument. so far, it's pro all the way.
Posted by greenriver8 9 years ago
greenriver8
You guys are overlooking one thing: Chicago. The Packers already lost homefield advantage by a season sweep by da Bears. The Cowboys lost to the Patriots, a team on the verge of greatness. The Packers lost to the Bears. Twice, an admittedly shaky season, I know, but when you lose to a division rivial with a 3rd string QB, you can question the distance the Packers will go.
18 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Multi_Pyrocytophage 5 years ago
Multi_Pyrocytophage
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:34 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter V-bomb on Pro V-bombing himself, and counter to NeenahLibertanian giving himself three points.
Vote Placed by DaBestGuy1010 5 years ago
DaBestGuy1010
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Vote Placed by OberHerr 5 years ago
OberHerr
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Well....they didn't make it so.....
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 5 years ago
PeacefulChaos
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: They didn't make it, lol, so Pro loses :D
Vote Placed by nassif.nicholas 8 years ago
nassif.nicholas
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by kcougar52 9 years ago
kcougar52
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by stevster 9 years ago
stevster
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by indicolts 9 years ago
indicolts
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by sdcharger 9 years ago
sdcharger
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Partyboat 9 years ago
Partyboat
nassif.nicholasNeenahLibertarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03