The Instigator
rlarson
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
1harderthanyouthink
Con (against)
Winning
36 Points

The ISIS Will Spread Ebola to the US

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
1harderthanyouthink
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/11/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,018 times Debate No: 63072
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (8)
Votes (6)

 

rlarson

Pro

Becuase the ISIS is evil and will edstroy America, we must stand up and fight. If Obama thinks we will just sit here and do nothing we will die. We must arm ourselves because the ISIS will bring Ebola here. But the dirty liberals don't want no guns here, no sir.
1harderthanyouthink

Con

Because Ebola has only had a major outbreak in western Africa, it is highly unlikely that the Islamic State brings it to the United States. The Islamic State is present in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Algeria, and Libya. None of these countries have an outbreak [1] nor do they border the infected countries: Guinea, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Spain (only 1 person [dead]), the US (only 1 person [dead]), Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Senegal (only 1 person).

Also, Obama has nothing to do with Ebola, and this is not the place for a gun argument.

[1]: http://www.cdc.gov...;
Debate Round No. 1
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by 18Karl 2 years ago
18Karl
You have no idea.

http://rudaw.net...
Posted by rlarson 2 years ago
rlarson
There's no way the libtards have been able to use enough of their IDIOT brains to conspire against the conservative truth. I should be winning.
Posted by Wrappers 2 years ago
Wrappers
You also cannot spell, nor use punctuation correctly.
Posted by Wrappers 2 years ago
Wrappers
Wow... You're racist as well as misinformed, rlarson...
Posted by Emilrose 2 years ago
Emilrose
In no way is ISIS in danger of bringing Ebola to the U.S, or other western nations. Terrorism perhaps, but not a highly infectious medical disease.
Posted by rlarson 2 years ago
rlarson
Filthy negro terrorist lover
Posted by rlarson 2 years ago
rlarson
Yessir I was right: you're a libtard idiot. Thanks for the win retard.
Posted by rlarson 2 years ago
rlarson
You evolutionist Commie idiot, you can't match my argument.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Zanomi3 2 years ago
Zanomi3
rlarson1harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Full win to Con. Conduct after looking at comments, spelling and grammar for obvious reasons. Convincing arguments to Con (clearly), and sources because Con used a source. Hands down win for Con.
Vote Placed by ldow2000 2 years ago
ldow2000
rlarson1harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's case was essentially one useless statement, while Con presented evidence. Not exactly a full case either, but more than Pro!
Vote Placed by republicofdhar 2 years ago
republicofdhar
rlarson1harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro just landed here to make an irrational point. This debate clearly goes to Con.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
rlarson1harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: con is only one to use sources, rebuts pro's single argument
Vote Placed by Hawkeye117 2 years ago
Hawkeye117
rlarson1harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is just an idiot and just had to bring up liberals and gun control which has nothing to do with this argument
Vote Placed by geothermal 2 years ago
geothermal
rlarson1harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better conduct and provided source. Pro's sounded like an angry rant and fear mongering.