The Instigator
getREKT420
Pro (for)
Tied
4 Points
The Contender
TBSmothers
Con (against)
Tied
4 Points

The Illuminati is run by the all knowing sentient cows of Canada.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/9/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 696 times Debate No: 80753
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

getREKT420

Pro

Okay, let's start this bad boy off by saying that you are already wrong. The Illuminati, as we all know, is watching our each and every movement. Their ultimate reign is coming. It's inevitable. And who, might you ask, is leading this elite force of unstoppable "evil doers"? Why, it can only be the only sensible option out there: the sentient cows of Canada! Many make fallacious claims such as, "But how can one organization be run by some soon-to-be hamburgers?" These ignorant people have absolutely no idea what they're talking about because they're hypocrites who only want some more fattening hamburgers to fill themselves with because they gain pleasure from being incredibly fat. Illuminati expert, Austin Cummings, exclaimed that "Cows are our superiors and are much more intelligent than most humans and should be treated with such respect and because our lack of respect for them they have devised a group called the Illuminati and one that is parallel to that what was created in 1774. Their Illuminatious influence is present in everyday lives their evil subjects named vegans have tried to take over the world but have been suppressed" This accurate statement now proves this already know fact true because this perfectly credible source says so.
TBSmothers

Con

Before beginning I would like to thank the pro for inviting me to this debate and wish him the best of luck.
Although I am not a strong believer of the illuminati, in this debate I will be arguing that it would make much more sense for an organization of the caliber to be run by homosapiens rather than cows. I will close out this round with a few charts that will assist in the point I am attempting to make.

http://restoreourplanetdiet.com...

http://www.wsj.com...

From these 2 charts we can conclude that as of today the average human is living almost 4 times

longer than the natural lifespan of a cow. Though that's only the "Natural" lifespan of a cow, in reality

we all know that most cows won't be reaching that lucky number of 20. Many cows will be sent to the

slaughter house in a matter of years. In my opinion if cows can't manage to live past 5 years then they

are not capable of creating an organization that "is watching our each and every movement." Though

unlike cows, humans have managed to steadily increase their lifespan over the years. Increase in

lifespan show's a species ability to adapt to it's surroundings and flourish. This is why it would make

much more sense for humans to be behind the illuminati rather than the species that is also referred

to as beef jerky. I await the pro's response.

Debate Round No. 1
getREKT420

Pro

getREKT420 forfeited this round.
TBSmothers

Con

The pro has failed to respond, so I will not be putting forth any further arguments at this time.
Debate Round No. 2
getREKT420

Pro

Ok, that last round... that didn't happen. As for the debate, all of those points previously stated were invalid and let me tell you why. You said, and I quote, "I will close out this round with a few charts that will assist in the point I am attempting to make." Simply put, you are not sure of yourself. You claim to be "attempting" to prove something true rather than than asserting it to be true. This is a critical debating error, I would know as I am a master debater. Nevertheless, this uncertainty of your "facts" brings down your argument validity down to a zero whereas nobody will believe that you are even "attempting" to persuade them. Because here in America, if you don't believe in yourself, then you will never accomplish your wildest dreams. The dreams your childhood was made of. The dreams wish for on your birthdays. The dreams that will be the downfall of your sanity if you don't spend the rest of your life chasing them down and living them out as you wonder what the real meaning of them are. Because in reality, life is only a temporary state of consciousness until we all die out in painful deaths filled with grief and despair. But please, enjoy Arby's™.

bacon pie chart
And here is a chart that assertively illustrates why you are wrong, thank you for time.
TBSmothers

Con

The pro began the last round by saying that I am unsure of myself. I have a question for you pro, did I once say that i'm not sure of myself? Just to be clear I didn't. The statement "I am attempting to make" does not imply self-doubt, but is rather my way of saying "let me show you why i'm right". The pro then went on to mention things such the American dream (which is dead but that's an entirely different debate topic), Arbys, and then topped it all off with an opinionated graph about people liking bacon. The pro's entire 3rd round argument was filled with fallacious/irrelevant remarks, and did not help him in any way. The pro has left me with nothing to counter, so I have nothing more to offer to this debate. So to conclude I would once again like to thank the pro for inviting me to this debate, and wish him the best of luck.

Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by imabench 1 year ago
imabench
getREKT420TBSmothersTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the Illuminati is run by cows of Canada. However, he failed to prove that the Canadian Illuminati cows are all-knowing sentient cows, which the debate resolution suggests. He has therefore fallen short of his burden of proof, and arguments therefore have to go to con. I do award conduct points to Pro though since con attempted to use logical sources in a debate, which is very frowned upon here on DDO
Vote Placed by Lexus 1 year ago
Lexus
getREKT420TBSmothersTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments that the cow Illuminati exists in Canada exists (warranted by Austin Cummings) were never refuted in an actual way. This means that any dropped arguments should be held at the weight that they were given. Con's argument that it is improbable that cows can be old enough to join the illuminati was never refuted. So when weighing the impacts, it's a "it definitely exists" versus a "it probably doesn't exist" argument analysis. The bigger impact is "it definitely exists" thus I vote pro. As for conduct, pro forfeited a round, so conduct to con.