The Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog is deadlier than the Black Beast of Caerbannogg.
Debate Rounds (3)
The Black Beast, too, would be killed by a grenade, because it is just animated paper!
The paper would immediately light and the Black Beast would go even faster!
The killer rabbit is more likely to suffer from a heart attack as it is living and not paper.
Paper can not have a heart attack but a living creature can.
If you shoot a rabbit anywhere it will eventually die.
If you shoot paper it will get a hole but not die(even if you shoot it's head off.
Therefore the beast IS more deadly.
Plus we are having a debate o who is the most deadly.
SO WHY HAVE YOU RAISED WHO WOULD DIE FIRST?
Paper may not be able to have a heart attack, but its animator can, thereby causing the paper itself to end.
A rabbit may die from a bullet wound, but bullets did not exist in the middle ages (explosives had been created).
The paper would cease to exist because its animator is in the 20th century which did have bullets.
The beast is dependent on the existence of its animator and therefore it is less deadly.
WHICHEVER BEAST DIES FIRST IS OBVIOUSLY LESS DEADLY!
So think before you rebut.
marinemania1234 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: FF
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.