The Instigator
retabed62
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
marinemania1234
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

The Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog is deadlier than the Black Beast of Caerbannogg.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
retabed62
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/8/2014 Category: Movies
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 775 times Debate No: 61436
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

retabed62

Pro

The Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog is deadlier than the Black Beast, because it can leap at very fast speeds and can only be killed by use of Holy firearms. The Black Beast on the other hand can be leveled by a mere animator heart attack.
marinemania1234

Con

The sport of throwing holy hand grenades is popular in Swaziland .The killer rabbit is killed by a grenade whereas the beast cannot be killed by a huge grenade.
Debate Round No. 1
retabed62

Pro

The Killer Rabbit is killed by a grenade for obvious reasons: it's living.
The Black Beast, too, would be killed by a grenade, because it is just animated paper!
The paper would immediately light and the Black Beast would go even faster!
marinemania1234

Con

The sport of throwing holy hand grenades is popular in Swaziland . no matter how the beasts or rabbits are killed they both die.

The killer rabbit is more likely to suffer from a heart attack as it is living and not paper.
Paper can not have a heart attack but a living creature can.
If you shoot a rabbit anywhere it will eventually die.
If you shoot paper it will get a hole but not die(even if you shoot it's head off.
Therefore the beast IS more deadly.

Plus we are having a debate o who is the most deadly.
SO WHY HAVE YOU RAISED WHO WOULD DIE FIRST?
Debate Round No. 2
retabed62

Pro

The Killer Rabbit maybe able to suffer from a hear attack but IT DID NOT!
Paper may not be able to have a heart attack, but its animator can, thereby causing the paper itself to end.
A rabbit may die from a bullet wound, but bullets did not exist in the middle ages (explosives had been created).
The paper would cease to exist because its animator is in the 20th century which did have bullets.
The beast is dependent on the existence of its animator and therefore it is less deadly.

WHICHEVER BEAST DIES FIRST IS OBVIOUSLY LESS DEADLY!
So think before you rebut.
marinemania1234

Con

marinemania1234 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
retabed62marinemania1234Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: FF