The Instigator
TheAce
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Ore_Ele
Con (against)
Winning
30 Points

The New World Order- The best way to stop it in its tracks- is education.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Ore_Ele
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/9/2011 Category: Society
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,151 times Debate No: 16968
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

TheAce

Pro

The impending NWO is not a debatable in its existence. It is obvious that it is happening, so please do not make this an argument debating on whether this is a false "conspiracy".

I believe that the best way to hault this conspiracy is through educating the American public of its existence. Knowledge is power.

1st round- opening argument
2nd round- Rebuttles
3rd round- Closing argument.

I wish my opponent the best of luck.
Ore_Ele

Con

I have accepted this debate and wish to take a, hopefully, interesting twist.

Before we continue, we must first make sure that several words and phrases are defined.

NWO - "In conspiracy theory, the term New World Order or NWO refers to the emergence of a bureaucratic collectivist one-world government." [1]

My goal in this debate is to show that there are better ways of halting and even defeating the NWO than by simple education.

In this debate, we are not allowed to challenge the existence of the NWO, so I won't go there, however, we can challenge whether or not it is a good thing. But regardless to if it is good or not, the debate is about stopping it.

I will begin my arguments, first, on why education is not an effective means of halting or stopping the NWO, then I will go into better options.

1) Education may bring people to the NWO's side.

We have to remember that according to the conspiracy theorists, that the NWO is filled with the Grand Elite, individuals that hold practically limitless resources [2], including most of the media. Should they be publically outted, they will likely shift their goals from staying secretive, to manipulating the mindless public into supporting them. This can have dire concequenses to those opposed to the NWO. Rather than appearing as crazy people that we shouldn't make eye contact with and walk past as quickly as possible without making it appear as though that is what you are trying to do, the public will view them as terrorists, trying to take down a global government that only wants to help all the suffering people of the world (that is certainly one of the lines that they will pitch and spin).

2) Education is easily prevented

It would not be difficult for the NWO, with their vast resources, to flood the education with so much fake news about the NWO, that the sheeple cannot discern fact from crap. A bunch of fake storys that are anti-NWO, will make people think that all the "education" is rubbish. This will prevent any education movement from gaining any traction, except with those that already see the light.

I'll just start with those, and address anything else that my opponent brings up. Now, on to a better solution.

Kill every living person that is supporting the NWO.

No amount of money can make someone's face bullet proof, without horibly disfigureing it. And since the leaders of the NWO need to be able to control the public, part of that is looking the part. They can't do that if they look like Leonardo DiCaprio from Man in the Iron Mask. This means that they will always be exposed to some degree of danger and risk of assassination. So it is possible.

If all the members of the NWO are killed, it will obviously collapse, since there are no members to sustain it. Obviously if the NWO is completely collapsed, then it will not only have grinded to a halt, but been completely destroyed, thus preventing it from ever regaining momentum again (at least in the foreseeable future).

For now, I will end my round and allow my opponent to post his argument and rebuttal.

Thank you,

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...(conspiracy_theory)
[2] http://www.udel.edu...
Debate Round No. 1
TheAce

Pro

TheAce forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
TheAce

Pro

TheAce forfeited this round.
Ore_Ele

Con

Sorry this had to end, I was hoping for a fun debate where I could argue for the mass murder of people. But, it was not meant to be.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Ore_Ele 5 years ago
Ore_Ele
Make it 72 hours per argument, rather than 24 and I'll take this.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
TheAceOre_EleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Dance magic....DANCE!!!
Vote Placed by medic0506 5 years ago
medic0506
TheAceOre_EleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 5 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
TheAceOre_EleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: OreElo, you should debate this with Geo.
Vote Placed by BennyW 5 years ago
BennyW
TheAceOre_EleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by Rockylightning 5 years ago
Rockylightning
TheAceOre_EleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited.