The Instigator
bulls26
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
AKOONAMATATA
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

The New York Islanders will make the Stanley cup playoffs next year.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/9/2011 Category: Sports
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 597 times Debate No: 16959
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

bulls26

Pro

1. Acceptance
2. Argument
3. Rebuttal
4. Rebuttal
AKOONAMATATA

Con

I thank my opponent for this debate, and welcome her to Debate.org.

=Framework=
+ As the framer, my opponent has the burden of proof in this round.

+ As the recipient my only burden is to disprove my opponent, as my opponent has not made this debate one of reciprocal burdens. more simply put, I do not have a burden to prove that any-one beyond the common person is corrupted.

=Arguments=
+ My opponent has yet to actually prove that more than common people are corrupted.

+ My opponent has not proved that common people are corrupt.

+ My opponent has not given us the basic information of what constitutes corruption, thus there isn't even anything to go on in terms of debate.

=Conclusion=
+ My opponent has not warranted their case, and thus you must not vote for them.

+ Since you cannot vote for my opponent, and I am unable to disprove my opponent since she hasn't offered anything to disprove; you must vote for my by default.
Debate Round No. 1
bulls26

Pro

bulls26 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
bulls26

Pro

bulls26 forfeited this round.
AKOONAMATATA

Con

AKOONAMATATA forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
bulls26

Pro

bulls26 forfeited this round.
AKOONAMATATA

Con

AKOONAMATATA forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by gerrandesquire 5 years ago
gerrandesquire
Lol.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
bulls26AKOONAMATATATied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con at least made a case.