The Optimum Online Triple Play commercial is the most annoying currently played commercial on TV.
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 1/24/2008 | Category: | Entertainment |
| Updated: | 5 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 7,306 times | Debate No: | 2158 |
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (32)
Votes (73)
|
Before I make a few points as to why the commercial (seen here: http://youtube... ) is definitely the most annoying one that is currently played on TV, I must first specify that I am referring to American television number one, and number two, I am generally speaking about commercials on 'basic TV' i.e. on broadcast stations such as ABC, NBC, CBS, etc.
Point 1: Although the jingle is quite catchy (who doesn't find themselves singing along to 877-393-4448?), a large part of why we know the telephone number so well is because this commercial is literally played every 5-10 minutes on quite a number of TV stations. The fact that this advertisement is played constantly only means that we'll all become annoyed with it sooner than we would if this commercial was played more sparsely. Point 2A: The advertisement contains music from beginning to end, and the genre of choice (reggaeton) is not exceptionally popular in the United States. In fact, if you look up the most popular genres of music in the U.S., reggaeton consistently never appears in the top ten. Point 2B: Due to its Hispanic roots and typically the use of the Spanish language, it is fair to say that many fans of reggaeton are of Hispanic descent. It is obvious that the marketing agenda of this commercial was aimed at certain minority groups, including Hispanics and other people of color. However, according to websites like racialicious.com (forums that discuss racism in today's pop culture), this commercial succeeds not only at targeting certain groups, but actually condescending and marginalizing certain demographics. Point 3: This commercial is flat out cheesey from beginning to end. If the flashy (trashy) costumes and choreographed dancing mermaids weren't enough, the ugly pirate and random sea-monster in the bad costume just completely sends this disaster over the edge. And finally, let us not ignore the girls' coochie pop; it's definitely the icing on the cake.
First, I'd like to get this out of the way: That commercial was awesome. Of course, I realize that it might annoy me, too, if I saw it repeatedly. Of course, this is true for most commercials. Regardless, I believe you have overlooked, or perhaps not seen, another commercial. http://youtube... Yes, it's HeadOn. I'm not sure if that exact commercial is still being played, but they do have other HeadOn commercials, as well as a few other products with similarly styled commercials. These commercials are still being played, however rarely. They're not all that common, but they're a whole lot more annoying than some awesome reggae with pirates and a catchy tune. Back to ye. |
![]() |
|
HaHa -- is that Head On commercial real?! If so, I've never seen it... which brings me to my point that the Optimum Online commercial has much more exposure than the Head On commercial, and therefore has the capacity to 1) get stuck in your head more easily -- which tends to annoy most people, and 2) become annoying more quickly. This is also because of the most important aspect of my rebuttal: the Head On commercial only lasts for thirteen seconds while the Optimum Online commercial lasts for sixty two seconds. That's almost 5x the length of annoyingness that television viewers have to endure at each showing.
I would also like to remind you of the music content in the commercial, and how most people would find reggaeton music with corny lyrics about digital cable much more annoying than a short sentence being repeated three times in a row. Another reason why the music in this commercial is so annoying (it's hilarious too) is because the song being sung is not a 'real' song, but rather a song specifically created for the purpose of this advertisement. You have to see the commercial about a dozen times before you can finally sing along, and by that time you're so sick of the sing-song phone number (that you picked up after the first viewing) and weird sea monster (the fact that you can't tell for sure he's good looking or not is also annoying! hmph!) that you would rather change the channel entirely for the duration of the commercial rather than sing along with the TV. Re-Cap: 1) You admitted that seeing a commercial repeatedly would make it annoying... and nobody can deny the amount of times this freakin commercial is shown! 2) I did specify that I was referring to currently running TV commercials; I don't believe that the Head On commercial is still playing 3) My point about reggaeton not being especially popular in the U.S... 4) My point about people not knowing most of the words to the song... 5) The trashy/flamboyant costumes and how it makes the commercial appear low-budget rather than flashy or appealing... 6) My point about the juvenile, choreographed mermaids... 7) My point referencing the dancers' ridiculous coochie pop... 8) This commercial is so much longer than Head On commercial and most other commercials in general 9) Many people feel that this advertisement is racist and perpetuates a stereotype about Hispanics and Hispanic-Americans 10) DID I MENTION THE SEA MONSTER? Don't get me wrong -- this commercial is highly entertaining because of the fact that it absolutely sucks (was there a nicer way to put it?). But after awhile, it definitely gets pretty repetitive and definitely annoying. I personally love watching it and making fun of it; however, my personal point of view has nothing to do with the argument at hand. I think I've made good points about why many people find this commercial to be extremely annoying, even if I don't.
I suppose it depends on your area, since they play different commercials in different places. I, like kels in the comments section, have not seen the optimum online commercial played on TV. Also, whereas the Optimum Triple Play commercial takes many times to get irritating, HeadOn is annoying from view 1. Also, you spoke of the length of the commercial. I think this is a good thing, since it gives the commercial some variety. While the Optimum song might be corny, it's somewhat entertaining and not all that bad sounding. I guess I'll just respond to your numbered statements. 1> I'd hardly count annoyance of repetitiveness as making the commercial itself annoying. Even so, the commercial isn't played nationwide as often as it is for you locally. Neither myself nor kels in the comments section have seen the commercial. Also, according to kels, HeadOn is played multiple times per day some places. Now THAT would get annoying. 2> It is, just not as often (or maybe not at all) where you live. Optimum Triple Play isn't played where I live (NC), but it apparently is where you live. 3> Reggaeton isn't very popular in the US, but it isn't annoying. I obviously can't support this with evidence, but I assert that the music in the commercial isn't in itself annoying. Perhaps the phone number part is, but that's not much of the commercial, plus it's not all THAT annoying. 4> Irrelevant. I don't know most of the words to most commercials, this doesn't make them annoying. 5> Pirates, trashy? WHAT? How dare you speak ill of the chosen people. that just makes the commercial more awesome. 6> So the mermaids are lame. A few seconds in a minute long commercial isn't bad. At least it doesn't hurt my brain to watch them. 7> See #6. It's maybe not the coolest looking thing ever, but it's not actively annoying. 8> This is a good thing. The HeadOn commercial is like pure, concentrated annoyance. With the Optimum Triple Play commercial it's less annoyance AND it's spread out over the course of a minute. 9> Irrelevant, since that doesn't make it annoying. 10> After the pirates, the sea monster is the coolest thing in the commercial! I personally was disappointed at the small role he had in the commercial. I guess I'll end on that. I'll make a final assertion that HeadOn is definitely more annoying than the Optimum Triple Play commercial, and is likely the most annoying commercial ever conceived. Thanks for the debate! |
![]() |
73 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Wallstreetatheist 8 months ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by ASB 2 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Alchemistress 2 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 1 |
Vote Placed by Railsguardian 3 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Vote Placed by philosphical 3 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Paris 3 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Awed 3 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 2 | 3 |
Vote Placed by deadguyon2streets 3 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 2 | 5 |
Vote Placed by kaylitsa 3 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Tatarize 3 years ago
| Danielle | beem0r | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |




















Also, good job responding to posts from 3 months ago ;]
Honestly, I care neither about my win ratio nor the content of this debate lol. The commercial is hardly ever played anymore anyway. Plus, it was my first time (you popped my debate cherry)! However, while you may not be able to 'prove' that something is more annoying, you can certainly debate it... And while I think you are an excellent debater, I also happen to know that debate-wise I have far provided the more convincing arguments in this particular challenge. It doesn't bother me that the votes don't/won't ever reflect it.
You're over-usage of the word 'ignorant' has gotten rather trite and therefore lacks any real substance. Nice try though. However I'm not surprised that you got "offended" by my points, but perhaps if you stopped assuming that I was "attacking" Hispanics in any way, you would see that you are actually the one who is wrong.
It is not my opinion that Optimum was targeting a Hispanic audience with that commercial so calling me ignorant is the true ignorance here. Maybe you should do some research before attempting to put people in their place. For instance, the WALL STREET JOURNAL cites an article with the title "Ad Watch: When Sea Monsters Target Hispanic Consumers" in reference to the commercial (http://blogs.wsj.com/buzzwatch/2008/03/03/ad-watch-when-sea-monsters-target-hispanic-consumers/).
To get all uptight regarding my very valid reference is truly unnecessary. It is not a BAD thing that they were trying to target Hispanic audiences (they also made very clear in the commercial that you could call Puerto Rico and the like) because *EVERY* advertisement attempts to target a particular audience. So honestly, you're the one who's coming off as ignorant here. Sorry.
And by the way, I really don't care if you find other commercials on TV to be more annoying than the one in question. That's not what this debate was about, and it was here long before you were. This debate was about proving a point. Your opinion is totally irrelevant. In fact, whether or not the statement is true is also irrelevant. You're supposed to vote based on the better arguments, not your opinion, which I'm assuming you don't understand. Therefore "turning off the TV" or going to the bathroom is really... um... what? Tell me what that has to do with anything? Or don't. Whatevz.
I gave reasons, and responded to all my opponenent's reasons.
My opponenet even accepted that it was annoying, as would you if you watched it. The video makes that point for itself.