The Paradox Of The Stone Is Self-Refuting
The Paradox of the Stone poses the following question:
"Can God create a stone so heavy, he can't even lift it?"
First round is acceptance.
Firstly happy new year!
Before diverging into my argument i would like to firstly point out the answer to this question may highly depend on what someones view of what god actually is. Which God? My God or yours? Mine might be able to, yours may not.
My argument is a simple one, and will start by asking another question. Can Man build a stone so heavy, he can't even lift it? The answer is of course no. With time and technological improvements man has proven he can lift a man to the moon, no stone is too heavy. Surely if man can lift any stone, so can any God? For me this might be a question of time then, how long would it take for god to lift the heaviest of stones? Seconds? Days?
Why compare man to God in this manner? Seeing as there is zero evidence of any supernatural God, one can only presume the God to which you refer is a natural being, an 'idea', or man made. So if man can create God, man can surely end God, create a stone, lift a stone.
Ok, so perhaps a better way of asking this paradox is, can god create something even he can't undo? Then i would say yes. Man can build an atomic bomb, and leak nuclear waste into Earths oceans, the results being un-revocable, he can therefore no longer lift the stone... So to speak. But seeing as this is not the question... I will end on this, The God you MAY be referring to created the universe, matter and physics, to this 'being' weight, and the force of gravity simply do not exist, so again, no there is no such stone.
Well, thanks for accepting, but I had said that the 1st round was for acceptance. This leaves me in the awkward situation of having to ask that you refrain from posting any rebuttals or arguments in the 2nd round, since that would be unfair to me.
Although interesting, I will have to point out that all your arguments are irrelevant and hardly attack my position. If only you had let me post my argument first like I requested, you may have been better informed.Anyways, on to my arguments.
The Paradox of the Stone is a rhetorical question posed as an attempt to prove that the concept of an omnipotent (all-powerful) God is illogical. However, it is self-refuting because both the affirmative and negative responses to the riddle reveal that the concept of an omnipotent God is logical!If one answers no, than this means that God can't perform the logic defying task. However, a no implies that the definition of omnipotence excludes the power to defy logic, so it is already expected that God can't create this stone. God's omnipotence remains a logically sound concept.
If one answers yes, than this means that God can defy logic because that is what the task entails (being able to create a stone so heavy that an omnipotent being can't lift it). Since the definition of omnipotence used includes the power to defy logic, than God remains omnipotent, through defiance of logic, even though he can't lift the stone he made!
The Paradox of the Stone is self-refuting.
Thanks for this debate! Please do not use your turn to argue, as this would be unfair.
I'll respect your request not to reply to your argument.
Would just like to apologise, i'm new to the website and i was not aware of how the debate was to be structured. Thanks for the topic, feel free to add me.
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|