The Instigator
mapplesyruppancakes
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Creed8432
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

The PineApple

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
mapplesyruppancakes
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/24/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 440 times Debate No: 87171
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

mapplesyruppancakes

Con

PineApples should be banned from the world for one reason. Because they are weapons of mass destruction. The pineapple is responsible for the death of the dinosaurs and soon to be responsible for bringing on our future rulers (being the italian robot dog chefs) and kill the human race
Creed8432

Pro

Pineapples have no recorded deaths as of 2/24/2016. Coconuts on the other hand are the leading cause of death in America. This needs to be brought to our attention. This is the deadly tropical being. Pineapples are the least of our problems here.
Debate Round No. 1
mapplesyruppancakes

Con

On the contrary my good sir. occourding to the Havard Academy of Hillbillies the Pineapple contains high amounts of francium and that cold war missles were tipped with pineapples to give them there deadly factor.
Creed8432

Pro

I agree but pineapples themselves are not deadly. That is what you are implying mate. Of course with other substances they can be deadly. But apples, their seeds contain cyanide that will kill you in an instant in large amounts
Debate Round No. 2
mapplesyruppancakes

Con

I see your point but I still disagree with you. As i have stated earlier pineapple contain high amounts of francium which allow the tropical delicacy to explode when in contact with moisture.
Creed8432

Pro

There is no reported supermarket that has reported exploding because of pineapples. Your argument is invalid
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by funnyface318 1 year ago
funnyface318
this debate has no real meaning and shouldn't even be on here. Im sure you have something better to do than to argue if pineapples should be banned. Get a life.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by famousdebater 1 year ago
famousdebater
mapplesyruppancakesCreed8432Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had no argument to support his burden of proof. Only con presented an argument. Pro also failed to negates Con's argument. Con made the claim that pineapples have the potential to explode and explained why. Pro reported that there are no supermarkets that have exploded because of pineapples. This rebuttal is invalid because it is based on assertion and it merely kritks Con's point rather than refutes it. Just because something has never happened, it does not mean that it is impossible. The kritik is invalid because it fails to refute the contradiction that it evidently presents.