The Instigator
Con (against)
7 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

The Religious Right is beneficial to contemprary America

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/14/2010 Category: Politics
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,405 times Debate No: 11440
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)




I will let my opponent start off with how they think that the Religious Right is beneficial to America. I will then proceed to counter their contentions. This is four rounds, so my opponent agrees to not argue on R4, meaning they end their rebuttals at R3. Also, would it be asking too much for my opponent to be among the religious right?

Examples are to be fairly current, and centered around American, not international, affairs unless said example requires historical back up (i.e. The Constitution was drafted in 1789, and has been kept in America therefore it is an important document. NOT The Constitution was written by Christians therefore only Christians are Americans)

The religious right (RR) is defined as (probably) Christians (no in particular denominations) with a more politically conservative (disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change. []) outlook. Notable contemporary examples being Ted Haggard, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, and Pat Robertson to name a few.


Religious Right? Why limit myself to that... I'll prove that almost any group endorsing a particular viewpoint is beneficial to Contemporary America.

2 reasons:
(a) There is always a chance, however sure you are that a viewpoint is wrong, it is actually correct.
(b) Even if a particular viewpoint is dead-wrong, the clash of conflicting viewpoints will stimulate DISCUSSION. This leads to intellectual growth and pursuit of the truth.

Yes, under my reasoning, even extremists advocating flat-earth theory and Nazism are beneficial to America!

You might disagree vehemently with the Religious Rights, but join me in recognizing the benefits that any dissenting viewpoint carries.

Vote PRO.
Debate Round No. 1


"Religious Right? Why limit myself to that"
Well, for starters, because it was the premise of this debate? I'll be referring my rebuttals specifically to the Religious Right.

Contention a) Viewpoints have always been subjective. Disagreeing or agreeing with the RR is a matter of opinion. However, as I will show below, if that opinion hurts people then it is most definitely wrong, which since you have failed to define what "correct" is, and have associated it with "wrong", I will take it to mean "right", as in conformance with justice or law or morality, and we'll go from there.

Contention b) The RR has political influence and has made it's many prejudices into law, infringing on the health, happiness, and rights of many. Therefore their viewpoints actually inflict damage on society. Recent examples are:
the bans on gay marriage []
which as you can see here [] has a direst correlation with the presence of red states, which generally have a RR majority. In some cases, they have made it law where one can get fired from their job for being gay [].
The RR in Texas has recently begun to change their curriculum so that Civil Rights Activists, and even Thomas Jefferson, are left out of textbooks, which because of TX purchasing power, would influence the entire nations curriculum []. As well, they are putting a specifically Christian spin on history, meaning that any children of opposing viewpoints will have to test as though the Christian religion is right, breaking the separation of church and state.

So in both of these examples, while they are both definitely promoting discussion, they are damaging people, which is out weights the value of discussion any day. Their out dated convictions have intentionally hurt thousands of people, which by their own standards, is morally wrong. All other laws fall below it.

Therefore, the RR is not beneficial to contemporary America, and in fact hurts more than it helps.


trendem forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2


Guess what? The RR is NOT beneficial to contemporary America. Tum tidly tum tum.


trendem forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3


Well, this was hugely disappointing... The RR is NOT beneficial o contemporary America. Vote CON.


Something cropped up in real life. I think you would have won anyway, if it helps your ego. Hope you can find a better challenger.
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Scott_Mann 8 years ago
Yeah. Well.

Your mom.
Posted by Puck 8 years ago
lol Nags.
Posted by Xer 8 years ago
President: Barack Obama (D)
Ideology: Conservative
Party: Democratic Party

Posted by Scott_Mann 8 years ago
Ideology: Communist
Party: American Nazi Party

1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by trendem 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70