The Instigator
Purushadasa
Pro (for)
The Contender
acrobatic.diver
Con (against)

The Resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ Is a Historical Fact

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
acrobatic.diver has forfeited round #1.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/6/2017 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 252 times Debate No: 103437
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (12)
Votes (0)

 

Purushadasa

Pro

As a neutral third party (neither Christian nor atheist),
I can understand that the eyewitness accounts
recorded in the four Gospels hold much more historical weight
and reliability than any account by any individual
who was not an eyewitness, and who came along
no less than 2,000 years later.

Therefore I accept the eyewitnesses' testimony
regarding the Resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ from the dead.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Purushadasa 5 months ago
Purushadasa
Wow. Someone wrote: "My fopa
A demigod is sacrificed to himself, to save us from himself, for crimes our ancestors.
how that be?"

I'm not sure that any of that text is even English. Off your meds, bro?
Posted by Purushadasa 5 months ago
Purushadasa
"Well, I'm not going to make any comments."

You have already made two comments, you liar.

As I said, believers in atheist Dogma, such as you, are natural-born liars.

I'm gonna get a stick to try scrape this crap off the sole now! LOL
Posted by platoandaristotle 5 months ago
platoandaristotle
Well, I'm not going to make any comments. I will just let you figure out the problem with your argument, yourself.
Reread it over again. No further comments.
Posted by missmedic 5 months ago
missmedic
My fopa
A demigod is sacrificed to himself, to save us from himself, for crimes our ancestors.
how that be?
Posted by Purushadasa 5 months ago
Purushadasa
Bmyers, I'm pretty informal regarding debate rules.

My intention was just to discuss the issues that I mentioned in my OP, back and forth, until the 4 rounds run out. If you have a different idea for this debate than that, then I'm open to hearing your idea as well. =)
Posted by BMyers 5 months ago
BMyers
What is the format for this debate? How are the 4 rounds to be used?
Posted by Purushadasa 5 months ago
Purushadasa
Someone wrote:

"You kill one man (an immortal) to redeem others for the crimes of their parents. Did I get that right?"

No, you didn't get it right: I have never killed anyone.
Posted by missmedic 5 months ago
missmedic
You kill one man (an immortal) to redeem others for the crimes of their parents. Did I get that right?
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.