The Instigator
NeilPeartDebater
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
8803
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

The SEC is media biased.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
8803
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/26/2012 Category: Sports
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 834 times Debate No: 20511
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

NeilPeartDebater

Pro

First round affirmation, 2nd round constuctive, third round rebuttle.Topic: Resolved- The College Football league SEC is backed the media and will always get a biased opportunity.
8803

Con

if it was biast people wouldnt watch it it is just un fair some wat
Debate Round No. 1
NeilPeartDebater

Pro

Sure body watches the SEC, but it because the SEC is allowed to ignore some rules ( I wont bring up Cam Newton) and the media brags how the SEC has more National Championship Trophies than any other league, but the reality is that the SEC is in the National Championship Game every year. Vote PRO/AFF
8803

Con

sec sucks wac is were it is at
Debate Round No. 2
NeilPeartDebater

Pro

Okay so we agree the SEC is terrible, as far as the WAC conference goes I love Wyoming but hate Boise State (A.K.A. over-rated community college), So I Gotta go Pac 10 all the way.
8803

Con

bsu...bsu...bsu...rules u suck
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by YoungBrain 5 years ago
YoungBrain
NeilPeartDebater8803Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not make an argument
Vote Placed by DevonNetzley 5 years ago
DevonNetzley
NeilPeartDebater8803Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: My reasons lie within my votes.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
NeilPeartDebater8803Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Wtf? Conduct for personal attacks by Con
Vote Placed by THEBOMB 5 years ago
THEBOMB
NeilPeartDebater8803Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't understand....
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
NeilPeartDebater8803Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: both sides were too terrible for me to declare a winner