The Sandy Hook shooting was a conspiracy .
Debate Rounds (3)
The claims that the parents were actually actors is horribly offensive, as people react to losing a child in different ways. Whether it is crying because you are devastated or smiling because you believe they are in a better place or you are reminiscing, or a mixture of both.
Thank you to whoever takes up this debate, but I do think you are a despicable human being if you think it is a conspiracy.
Conspiracy: a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful. http://oxforddictionaries.com...
The group of cells that made up the body and mind of Adam Lanza conspired to do this shooting especially the nerve cells.
To think such an event was not a conspiracy is to deny the human ability to perceive what he is about to do and to act in a manner that he hadn't thought of at least for a split second before doing it.
Adam Lanza had planned to do it and since he is a group of cells, it is a conspiracy.
If however you prefer the alternative definition of a conspiracy; A government led event that is reported falsely for the sake of deception in order to achieve an ulterior motive.
Then you will find it extremely hard to ever refuse the 100% possibility that it all was planned by Obama and his men for the sake of encouraging gun control, which he has been an advocate of since the beginning of his term.
Thus all evidence supports the theory that it was a conspiracy. I do not deny it could have been a random event but using probability based on evidence one would conclude otherwise.
You are referring to "evidence" yet you don't provide any examples, which makes me believe there isn't any, or you've just been told there is evidence and blindly accepted it.
I know this reply is short but everything you brought up was irrelevant.
Number of rebuttals my opponent has: zero
Number of contentions my opponent has: zero
Number I have: one
My contention, written as clearly as possible shall now be stated below.
The democratic party, especially from the beginning of Obama's first term (and definitely second) have been mainly obstacles to his incessant urge for gun control. Need evidence? Okay: http://www.issues2000.org... http://wiki.answers.com...
HERE ARE DIRECT ARTICLES ON THE MATTER
Need more evidence? I have much more.
Sandy Hook would be reported as a mad-man who, if gun control were there, wouldn't have been able to have killed so many people bringing back harsh memories of the 2012 Aurora shooting and Columbine High School massacre.
So then Obama is all like...
And the people are all like:
And the gun rights activists get all depressed like:
Then the children break out in song and dance making false remarks such as:
Then Obama says "Hey, I'm only half black you know..."
Then we realise that ultimately it's more likely a conspiracy than not.
JamieKerr forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by likespeace 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Con was instigator, and alleged Sandy Hook wasn't a conspiracy. He thus has the burden to provide arguments in support of his assertion. He did not! In fact, Pro presented two arguments that it was a conspiracy. One was based on semantics, and the other was based on silliness. Still, as Con did not rebut his arguments nor prove his case and actually forfeited, Pro wins arguments and conduct. Pro also provided several sources.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.