The Soviet Union did more than the USA during World War 2
Debate Rounds (5)
Good Luck to you Lannan13
I'll let you give your opening statement.
5,000 characters 4 rounds
round 1 - Opening statements
round 2-4 Arguments
round 5 - Closing Statements
I believe that the US did more than the Soviets to help the Allies win World War 2. I await my opponents opening arguments.
The USA almost would have been neutral if it had not been for the Japanese. The Soviets being brought in by the Germans.
Now, while the USA supplied the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union's armies fought off an entire German invasion, not an easy thing to do.
The Germans were at the gates of Moscow, and yet the Soviet Union pushed them back.
US saves USSR by feeding Ukraine. During the hunger crisis the US sent tons of wheet to the Soviet Union to help feed the Ukrainians who they thought where having a drought, but were being starved by the Soviets. The Soviets then turned the boats around and sold the grain elsewhere for money so they could buy machinery in order to industrialize under Stalin. If the US hadn't fed the USSR, they wouldn't have survived and the Communists would have been overthrown and they would NOT have been in World War 2. So we can see that the US fed them and basically gave them the machinery for the war. (http://www.enrs.eu...) Already showing without the US the USSR wouldn't have been able to do anything in the war. The same occured during the Lend and Lease act. (http://www.historynet.com...)
Opperation Overlord and Opperation Fortitude were key in the war. The USSR needed a Second Front in Europe and the Allies delivered. The Allies invaded Italy and the Italian surrender ment that Hitler had to strech out his military even further. This allowed for the Soviets to push the Germans out of Russia as the Germans were unable to protect the "soft under belly of Europe" and Mussolini's surrender saw the escental collapse of NAZI forces in Russia. (http://www.globalresearch.ca...) After General Patton was taken out of active duty by attacking a shell-shocked soldier, he was put in charge of Opperation Foritude which was getting the "Army" ready for a full out European invasion. Everything was made out of balloons and when this fooled the Germans, Hilter took out even more troops to fortify France to get ready for the invasion, once again helping relieve stress from the USSR. (http://en.wikipedia.org...) The US would invade with the D-Day invaison, liberating France. To make things better in the War, the Germans withdrew ALL of their forces to attack the allies in the West at the Battle of the Bludge. General George Patton defeated the Germans and once again the US caused the USSR to be more victorious due to the US doing more to defeat the Germans. (http://www.history.com...)
Now let's look to the cassulties from the USSR. Much of the ground loss and the deaths were due to Stalin locking himself away for 3 whole days when the war began. The Soviet troops did NOTHING and were captured. Why, you may ask? They feared doing any type of Initiative under Stalin for fear of exicution, so the officers did nothing. Much of this can be seen depicted by George Orwell in his novel 1984 to explain the type of society that the USSR had. (http://ww2history.com...)
The Battle of Stalingrad is where the war in the Eastern Theater turned, Hitler's loss at Stalingrad was a huge blow Hitler and Stalin both knew the importance of Stalingrad, Whoever would win the battle would gain a large advantage in the war, this case being the Soviet Union. If the Germans had won that battle they would have been able to take Soviet Controlled Oil fields, severely cutting down on the Soviet Union's Oil production.
The German loss at the Battle of the Bulge also had a lot to do with the Germans low supply of oil.
I do conceede that point, but the American invasion of North Africa began on November 8th, of 1942, and this forced Rommel's troops to split and it forced Hitler to divert some of his military from the USSR and place them in Africa. This is why the NAZI air drop in Stalingrad did not work the way it was purposed to have worked. (http://en.wikipedia.org...)
I also extend across my arguments that my opponent has dropped of US arming the USSR and actually feeding them and if it wasn't for that we can see that the Soviets wouldn't have even been in the war. Plus Opperation Fortitude help fooled the NAZIs into holding off in a counter-offensive against the Normandy invasion.
You my friend put up a very good argument. I do stand by my state that the Soviet Union did more than the USA. good luck in the voting,.
I thank you and please vote Con!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by kasmic 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offers little to the debate only listing that the soviets fought off a German invasion. Plus pro admits the U.S. helped USSR's cause. Con adds to that listing and citing examples of the help the USSR got from the U.S. Con also provides numerous sources indicating the U.S. involvement. Sources to con and arguments as they are more substantiated and cited.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.