The Instigator
spellingbee
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
LatentDebater
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

The TSA should abolish their pat-down techniques on children.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
LatentDebater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/27/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,528 times Debate No: 29607
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

spellingbee

Pro

The TSA is using this disturbing and intrusive pat down on children. This is not right. Good luck if you accept.
LatentDebater

Con

The burden of proof lies on you.
Debate Round No. 1
LatentDebater

Con

I looked at them.

Since you have the full burden of proof, I am yet to have anything to refute and it is not up to the one absent of burden of proof to raise contentions.

Unfortunately you have left yourself with no choice but to do misconduct and raise new points in the last round so me raising new points in the last round is acceptable due to this unfortunate one-round debate you've left us with.
Debate Round No. 2
spellingbee

Pro

I have nothing to post.
LatentDebater

Con

Not one single reason for the TSA abolishing their carefully debated and well-established policy of patting down any and all human beings was presented by pro.

Pro had, and accepted, full BOP for the debate.

There is only one thing left to do to pro...

Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
I was looking forward to a debate. Pro used up all his rounds without starting.
Posted by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
The TSA should be disbanded. They have done no good whatsoever.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by OhioGary 4 years ago
OhioGary
spellingbeeLatentDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I can't sleep so I'm voting on one more of these. I realize that this is irrelevant to the vote but that's the breaks. Pro, as holder of BOP, you have to do more than post links. You have to explain them. You have to find the important information in them and bring them to the debate. Con rightly pointed out that you have BOP, and you did. But you didn't meet BOP. Argument to Con. Tie elsewhere.
Vote Placed by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
spellingbeeLatentDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not argue this debate, and conducted himself in a belligerent manner.