The United States Should Have A Moon Base
Debate Rounds (1)
1) the logistics and construction would be too complicated to be economically feasible as there is no oxygen or resources. Contained terraforming would take a long time.
2) landing directly on the moon would require additional fuel and resources versus using the slingshot retrajectory of orbits, which is also faster.
For these reasons I propose large space stations in orbit around the earth and moon for stage assembly and for logistical problem solving. Retrajectory from other bodies coils still be used and this method would also be faster http://www.optcorp.com...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by HeartOfGod 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con had more intricate reasons for this position and went further in depth. pro didn't really take time with his arguments, o I give arguments to con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.