The Contender

Open Debate
The United States should have a national health care system
Debate Challenge Expired
Nobody accepted the challenge for this debate. If you are asp1007, login to see your options.
| Started: | 4/17/2010 | Category: | Politics |
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Challenge Declined |
| Viewed: | 812 times | Debate No: | 11772 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (20)
Votes (0)
|
The United States claims to be based upon a laissez faire free market system in which free exchange spurs internal growth and creates increasing wealth. If this is indeed the goal of the USA Americans must recognize that free exchange cannot exist in the health care industry without regulation. The creation of a government option in the healthcare industry is needed in order to prevent against patients being taken advantage of by their physicians.
While I certainly agree with the premise of the laissez faire economic system, I believe that there are certain sections of society that do not conform to this theory. The idea of free trade is based upon the ability of individuals to make rational decisions and make pricing comparisons. An individual facing an urgent medical condition does not have the time to investigate alternative treatment prices and locations. Furthermore, transport to another location in order to receive treatment drastically increases the financial burden in receiving care. As a citizen of Canada I receive health care through a national insurance program and elements which are not covered are left to our own expenses. Doctors are paid by the government program which sets an agreed upon rate for certain procedures. Any procedure not covered by the insurance program is paid by the individual. While this system is not ideal I believe that it has prevented patients from being turned away with serious conditions due to their inability to afford a particular doctor's set price. The United States could easily create a superior health care system where doctors are mandated to allocate a percentage of their time to working under a national health care plan while still enabling them to run their private practise and see patients who wish to accelerate the process. The current health care system in the United States has numerous flaws which can be remedied by implementing a Government Option or another version of a national health care system. This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
|
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
|
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
|
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
|
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
This debate has 10 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.










wut
i dont find that to be very fair and also dont see the insentive for people to care about their own health.
though I think you are clearing things up a bit more---your side is saying that you cant have a good insurance system for health care if you do not give a government option as well....is that right?? but no true focus on its funding...just debating the idea of it...yes?
My nationality has no effect on the truth of my viewpoint. You cannot have a free market society without a government option in health care. So yes I do believe I have criticize your system just the same way that many feel they can criticize the totalitarian regimes of the middle east while 90% are unaware where these countries are geographically.
Ps. This idea of Big Gov Vs Small Gov is just another way of framing Individual rights V Collectivism... and big government can exist while maintaining individual rights which is the true basis of classical liberalism and libertarianism.
though, i personally think its worse now....not sure your idea of a public option would be better than what we have now but it surely would be better than this bill....totally agree!! :)
and yes I do think that outside views are not a great idea....not that you cant have your opinion and I'm glad you do....but (I think you're from Canada, right?) if i said that everyone in canada should give 100% of their paychecks to the government to support a cause....wouldnt you say that its not MY money and therefore i should have no 'say' as to what happens to it?
if everyone in the world could get the best health care at all times and no one had to pay for it--yes, thats the best system....but when you are debating an issue as to how some americans should be taxed higher to pay to the government and then let the american government decide how to care for the rest of the population....i think you are out of line.
but....ur welcome to your opinon of course, just that it doesnt effect you nearly in the same way and so your 'outside view' cannot fully comprehend those inside the boarders dealing with this issue.