The Instigator
frenchmoose
Pro (for)
Losing
34 Points
The Contender
XStrikeX
Con (against)
Winning
59 Points

The WII's processer is made of wheat and acorns

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 14 votes the winner is...
XStrikeX
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/18/2010 Category: Religion
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 4,577 times Debate No: 11785
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (75)
Votes (14)

 

frenchmoose

Pro

The wii is useless.. its processer is made of cheese and wombat juice.
XStrikeX

Con

Hello, I am XStrikeX, representing the con or opposition side of this debate, stating that the Wii's processor is not made of, as my opponent says, wheat nor acorns.

I'd first like my opponent to clarify:
1. The topic clearly states that the Wii processor is made of wheat and acorns, so why are you arguing about cheese and wombat juice?
2. Are you talking about the video game console Wii, or some strange acronym since you posted the topic to be WII?

If my opponent is talking about the video game console, here are my points.

Contentions

1. The Wii processor is clearly not made of edible foods. The Wii is a console that takes gaming to a new level. It involves games using a Wii remote, that does not have to be connected to the console like other former gaming systems, but instead can be waved around without a connecting wire. If the Wii processor was made of acorns and wheat, it could not at all function properly or play games properly. However, it does and the Wii is extremely popular, which will lead to my second point.

2. If the Wii was "useless," as my opponent has stated, no one would use their money to purchase such a product. However, it sold out wildly when it was released and the United States even saw a shortage on Wii products.

3. If the Wii was made of acorns and wheat, it could not at all process video games or display them on the screen. However, Wii's do allow gameplay and are quite fun.

Look at this video I posted above to see that the construction of a Wii processor is really complex and not composed of wheat or acorns.

As I have just proven, Wii processors are not made of wheat and acorns. :-|
Debate Round No. 1
frenchmoose

Pro

-"the Wii processor is made of wheat and acorns, so why are you arguing about cheese and
wombat juice?"- apparently my opponent agrees with me.

-" Are you talking about the video game console Wii, or some strange acronym since you posted the topic to be WII?"- my opponent is completely insane and thinks that world war 2 ran on a Wiis procceser.

-I would like to respond to my opponents video with this...-
XStrikeX

Con

This debate is very... peculiar, I should say.
I'd like to point out that my opponent has not refuted ANY of my points and used a single point to further his case, which was completely irrelevant. I will get to that later.

About my opponent quoting me...
If you look back, ladies and gentlemen, their is more to the quote. The argument states that the Wii processor is made of wheat and acorns, not me. If my opponent was reading, I opened up with an introduction stating that the Wii was not made of acorns or wheat.

If he thinks I'm insane, I think he's insane, for he posted an extremely idiotic video. I just wanted to see if you were talking about some other thing, since you said WII, instead of Wii, for I have seen many debates to have tricky edges to them.

It's pretty obvious that prior to his video-making, my opponent shoved waffles into his XBox container... And if it was made all of waffles, then the container would be soft, not hard... Thus proving that it is not made of waffles...

This debate is really messed up.>:|
That's my argument....
Debate Round No. 2
frenchmoose

Pro

-"This debate is very... peculiar"- I'd say!

- "I just wanted to see if you were talking about some other thing, since you said WII, instead of Wii,"- How could i have possibly explained how the world war 2 ran on a procceser. It wouldnt even make sense in the title :P.

-"It's pretty obvious that prior to his video-making, my opponent shoved waffles into his XBox container... "- You have absoultuly no proof of this being true.

-"And if it was made all of waffles, then the container would be soft, not hard... Thus proving that it is not made of waffles.."- I never said it was made of waffles but that it RAN on waffles.

- I belive that my opponent now owes me a sanwhich and 11 bottles of kool-aid.- !!!!!vote for PedRO!!!!!
XStrikeX

Con

WII does not stand for World War II, Frenchmoose... That would be WWII. Hence, the second w for war.

Rebuttal

My opponent has stated that I have no proof of him shoving waffles into his XBox... Well, I'm pretty sure you're not allowed to bring in your own experiences as they could be false and untrue, but seeing as he did, I shall too. I own an XBox. My best friend owns an XBox. And my neighbor owns an XBox. We opened all of them and voila, no waffles at all.

I suppose my opponent is right that he said the XBox ran on waffles. However, this is still illogical. He connected an XBox to a Wii using the idea that waffles come out of XBoxes. But this topic is "Wii processors are made of wheat and acorns." MADE, clear word, MADE. He said RAN. So thus, his analogy is incorrect and invalid.

Ladies and gentlemen, my three points remain tall and true, and my opponent has no points at all, seeing as I just refuted his video point.
-=VOTE CON=- (Yay, Pedro!)
Debate Round No. 3
75 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by frenchmoose 6 years ago
frenchmoose
boy, your swift to respond
Posted by XStrikeX 6 years ago
XStrikeX
Probably 70000000-0
In my favor, of course.
Posted by frenchmoose 6 years ago
frenchmoose
what would you have it be ?
Posted by Koopin 6 years ago
Koopin
How is it 34 - 59?
Posted by Moistcabbage 6 years ago
Moistcabbage
Indeed, an a$$ full of acorns.
Posted by bobyochen 6 years ago
bobyochen
the wii is a$$ end of debate
Posted by XStrikeX 6 years ago
XStrikeX
Check your spelling once in a while. I'm done arguing. :P
Posted by Moistcabbage 6 years ago
Moistcabbage
You needn't be so angry. Let's take this slowly for your sake. If the wheat and or acorns are sealed inside the probcessor, the water cannot evaporate and therefor will stay moist indefinately. The reason for using wheat or acorns is a simple matter of economics, they are cheaper and more enviormentally friendly thantheir man made counterparts. Please do not wet your entire wii console. It will not work any longer. Only the acorns and wheat should be wet. Just because your video shows people in fancy lab coats and hairnets does not make it any more relivent than feenchmoose's home made one. ( wich I'm sure would have been more informative I he had not been interupted by that large gentleman informing him of the mischiefous grapefruit) your video doesn't even show a wii at all. Let alone prove that the chip shown is even intended for the wii. Also I don't believe scientists build wiischip. They are usually finding cures and desease and contemplating space travel. I will be happy to chat about this topic further as soon as you have any relavent argument.

Moistcabbage, happy fields asylum. Frankfurt Germany.
Posted by XStrikeX 6 years ago
XStrikeX
And also, Frenchmoose made no sense about tearing something apart to see what was on the inside and it was irrelevant to what we were discussing at that moment. When I said you built it, I was talking about people like scientists. I didn't mean him directly. Gosh, you guys need to complete first grade.
Posted by XStrikeX 6 years ago
XStrikeX
You are the dumbest guy I've ever heard! First of all, who puts a f***in acorn or piece of wheat to use as a conductor?? We have metals, you idiot. And how would you presume to keep the acorn and wheat wet?? HUH?? I GOT A BRIGHT IDEA!!! LET'S PUT WATER ON THE WII AND IT'LL WORK!!! DUH!!! I'M SO SMART!! At least I actually have a video in a lab, not a stupid video produced by myself where I can shove frickin waffles into an XBox. Moistcabbage, go to a mental asylum or at least go to solitary confinement where you can be no further burden to the public. >:(
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by bobyochen 6 years ago
bobyochen
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Rockylightning 6 years ago
Rockylightning
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by theitalianstallion 6 years ago
theitalianstallion
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Marauder 6 years ago
Marauder
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by DontBeRacist 6 years ago
DontBeRacist
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by hardyweinberg 6 years ago
hardyweinberg
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by arethusa668 6 years ago
arethusa668
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by kylesnake 6 years ago
kylesnake
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Mr_Jack_Nixon 6 years ago
Mr_Jack_Nixon
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Animefan725 6 years ago
Animefan725
frenchmooseXStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70