The Instigator
Cowboy0108
Pro (for)
Losing
8 Points
The Contender
PessimisticallyOptimistic
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

The best way to end a war is to just bomb the entire country you are at war with.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
PessimisticallyOptimistic
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/21/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 934 times Debate No: 36892
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

Cowboy0108

Pro

If we just bomb the country we are at war with, our soldiers would not die, the war woudl end quickly, and we could immediately begin extracting raw materials(if we chose to do that).
Debate Round No. 1
Cowboy0108

Pro

It would also be more cost effective.
PessimisticallyOptimistic

Con

i dont think so cause yeah
Debate Round No. 2
Cowboy0108

Pro

I have seen no reasons that you have given that would disagree with mine. Vote PRO.
PessimisticallyOptimistic

Con

Smiley Face No Sir
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by LoopsEye 4 years ago
LoopsEye
what nonsense is this does it even deserves a vote? Not My Valuable one Man!
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Juan_Pablo 4 years ago
Juan_Pablo
Cowboy0108PessimisticallyOptimisticTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro and Con both gave lousy arguments. However, being an independent-minded voter I gave the win to the position of Con (which I'm a member of) because the resolution is idiotic and assures the destruction of the human race!
Vote Placed by Gondun 4 years ago
Gondun
Cowboy0108PessimisticallyOptimisticTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: From what I can see, PessimisticallyOptimistic appears to be a fake account created by Cowboy0108 in order to get him more wins. PO has no account information, only one friend (which is Cowboy0108), and his first 4 debates in his first 2 days have been against Cowboy and he has given this kind of argument in most of them. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry, but even then you should not be rewarded for such a weak debate.
Vote Placed by philochristos 4 years ago
philochristos
Cowboy0108PessimisticallyOptimisticTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro at least offered an argument.
Vote Placed by countzander 4 years ago
countzander
Cowboy0108PessimisticallyOptimisticTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Not really a debate since Con didn't do anything, but Pro at least gave reasons for his position.