The companies going to other countries is bad for the U.S
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 3/5/2009 | Category: | Politics |
| Updated: | 4 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 524 times | Debate No: | 7247 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)
|
I'll only need 2 rounds you go first.
I'd argue it's good. In fact I'd argue that it increases capital in countries that sorely need it and additionally brings us low costs materials. For instance in the last couple of month, unlike most, Walmart's stocks have increased. Specifically this is because people enjoy buying cheap goods from Walmart. Walmart can sell cheap because it creates it's good in places such as China. This makes everyone happy. =) Your turn. ^.^ |
![]() |
|
joshuaXlawyer forfeited this round.
Still your turn. |
![]() |
|
joshuaXlawyer forfeited this round.
Although my first argument was more or less a tease there isn't an refutation to any of my points by the end of the debate. Thus I can only urge a vote for Con. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Yraelz 4 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by joshuaXlawyer 4 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Yraelz 4 years ago

Report this Comment
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Yraelz 4 years ago
| joshuaXlawyer | Yraelz | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Crust89 4 years ago
| joshuaXlawyer | Yraelz | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Vote Placed by crackofdawn_Jr 4 years ago
| joshuaXlawyer | Yraelz | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |







