The con wins a debate.
Debate Rounds (2)
You are con. This implies you mean to say opposite of topic. Therefore your motto is that pro wins the topic.
If you win this debate, this means that you were correct for saying pro wins the debate but I lose and I am pro, therefore your argument goes wrong. Hence, I should win and that is what I want. You are now stuck in the bog of words.
Thanks for entering the trap.
What? The resolution clearly states that Con wins the debate. I was Con. I showed you that Con does not win all debates. What else is there? I had carefully read over all words, and showed you that Pro can win. Because you were Pro that con wins a debate, and I was Con and showed you evidence that Pro can win, I clearly win.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ssadi 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Given under comments (4th and 5th comment). Conduct, S&G, and sources are ties.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.