The Instigator
Blob
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
InVinoVeritas
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

The condition of being alive results from chemical reactions only.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
InVinoVeritas
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/16/2012 Category: Science
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,088 times Debate No: 22057
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

Blob

Pro

The condition of being alive results from chemical reactions only.
Debate Round No. 1
Blob

Pro

Sorry, I set this debate up all wrong. Too few characters are allowed and I cannot see how to change it. 
InVinoVeritas

Con

Fail. >.<
Debate Round No. 2
Blob

Pro


I was stoned out of my brain and thought I was changing the number of words, not the number of characters.

You were going to lose the debate anyway, so don't be upset.



Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by TheDiabolicDebater 5 years ago
TheDiabolicDebater
Damn. I really would have enjoyed watching this had it actually been debated.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
BlobInVinoVeritasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Did not meet BOP.
Vote Placed by Yep 5 years ago
Yep
BlobInVinoVeritasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro when your stoned don't go on a debate website, try reading a book upside down, it's freaky. Also, incredibly rude sh!t coming from pro's mouth saying he woulda won anyway lol...
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
BlobInVinoVeritasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: lol
Vote Placed by larztheloser 5 years ago
larztheloser
BlobInVinoVeritasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Being stoned is no excuse for being stupid. Ask any anti-drug-prohibitionist. Oh, wait.
Vote Placed by Mimshot 5 years ago
Mimshot
BlobInVinoVeritasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: So much fail. Also, Pro could have at least tried.