The Instigator
critical_mind
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
1Devilsadvocate
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

The create monster in the ground exist

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
1Devilsadvocate
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/8/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 886 times Debate No: 30039
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

critical_mind

Pro

DEFINITION
The create monster in the ground :(cmg)
Is an entity that lives outside of space time which his spirit lives in all of us

proof:
1)all things are attracted to each other
2)every object have a mysterious something that cause such attraction
3)that something is the spirit of the (cmg)
therefore the (cmg) exist
1Devilsadvocate

Con

This is not at all logical, it's probably a troll debate.

I challenge pro to prove "2)every object have a mysterious something that cause such attraction"

& "3)that something is the spirit of the (cmg)".


Debate Round No. 1
critical_mind

Pro

First i would like to welcome my debater
With all respect if you think that's a troll debate why did you accept it

Now to your challenges
1)All objects that have mass or energy attracts each other the bigger the object the stronger the force of attraction
(gravity)

According to the law of causality everything must be caused by something and since everything have an attraction force Then it must be caused by something independent but within the body

There's 2 things that could exist within but independent of the body
1)Minds
2) Spirits

Minds interacted with through the brain but independent of the brain but minds require a conscious being
So the mind cannot be the cause of such attraction because the mind end with consciousness and consciousness end with death
And also there're unconscious object that contain such attraction ex: (earth , sun,etc) so it cant be a mind

Then it must be a spirit therefore by definition the spirit of the (cmg)
http://en.wikipedia.org...
1Devilsadvocate

Con

Why must it "exist within but independent of the body"?
Debate Round No. 2
critical_mind

Pro

I said could not must
1Devilsadvocate

Con

That's not true.

Pro wrote in R2:

"According to the law of causality everything must be caused by something and since everything have an attraction force Then it must be caused by something independent but within the body"[sic]

Furthermore in R1 pro defined cmg as, "an entity that lives outside of space time which his spirit lives in all of us " [sic].


Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by TheSaint 4 years ago
TheSaint
What do you mean by all objects attract each other? Do you mean gravity? If so then it's not mysterious... And where is your proof that this force even if it is mysterious lives outside space and time as your CMD definition would imply?

Your proof is flawed and your resolution needs a much greater explanation.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Muted 4 years ago
Muted
critical_mind1DevilsadvocateTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has the BoP. Because Pro fails to establish his case, Con gets the win. Both sides had several S/G mistakes, but Pro had more such mistakes than Con. Therefore Con gets S/G.
Vote Placed by TheSaint 4 years ago
TheSaint
critical_mind1DevilsadvocateTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side made convincing points... Pro actually had an argument whereas con didn't write more then a sentence... So I have to vote for pro, but it was not a good debate either way.