The Instigator
joshuaXlawyer
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
headphonegut
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

The death penalty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/19/2011 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 626 times Debate No: 16040
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

joshuaXlawyer

Con

This round is for acceptance.
headphonegut

Pro

I think the resolution is self explanatory you against, me for.

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
joshuaXlawyer

Con

joshuaXlawyer forfeited this round.
headphonegut

Pro

headphonegut forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
joshuaXlawyer

Con

joshuaXlawyer forfeited this round.
headphonegut

Pro

headphonegut forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
joshuaXlawyer

Con

joshuaXlawyer forfeited this round.
headphonegut

Pro

sad anyone wanna pick this up?
Debate Round No. 4
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Ore_Ele 5 years ago
Ore_Ele
He's doing a surprise debate. If he puts his arguments forth, than only people that believe they can beat him will accept (thus putting him at a disadvantage). He wants to debate anyone that thinks their views are strong enough without having to know his views first.

Though definitions would be a good idea.
Posted by Bob_Gneu 5 years ago
Bob_Gneu
How can you expect anyone to accept if you haven't defined anything, put forth any of your views or anything?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
joshuaXlawyerheadphonegutTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 5 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
joshuaXlawyerheadphonegutTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit by instigator.