The Instigator
invisibledeity
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
scienceNerd48
Pro (for)
Winning
38 Points

The earth is ROUND

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
scienceNerd48
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/14/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 683 times Debate No: 52478
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (8)

 

invisibledeity

Con

Prove to me that the arth is wround and I will show you why YOU ARE WRONG!!
scienceNerd48

Pro

The earth is not round or flat it is a ovular shape
Debate Round No. 1
invisibledeity

Con

Blh blah blah. my opponent cant how the huearth is ROUND.

But I will show it is FLAT

Christianity says the earth is ROUND.
But Christianity is FALSE.

The Bible indicates that the earth is round. One verse we can look at is Isaiah 40:22, where it mentions the “circle of the earth.” From space, the earth always appears as a circle since it is round. This matches perfectly with the Bible.
Another verse to consider is Job 26:10, where it teaches that God has “inscribed” a circle on the surface of the waters at the boundary of light and darkness. This boundary between light and darkness is where evening and morning occur. The boundary is a circle since the earth is round.

But we all know there is NO EVIDENCE for the bible!!

Therefore, the earth cannot be flat!

LOL. I dont really believe this, but its fun to show how WRONG your opponent is!!!
scienceNerd48

Pro

Your previous argument made no sense at all, therefore I have nothing to rebut.
Debate Round No. 2
invisibledeity

Con

LOLOL!! My opponent has NO RESPONSE to my arguments because he CANNOT refute them!!! All he does is make himself LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT!!!

ADMIT IT! You have NO IDEA how to respond to my far superior arguments!
scienceNerd48

Pro

If I can't respond than what is this:

I think your responses are childish and immature because this is a website for debators not text maniacs who say LOLOL in every argument.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Warden123 2 years ago
Warden123
To be Honest, you are wrong. pro won the debate. All con did was rant without a valid arguement.
Posted by Youth 2 years ago
Youth
Well then, Con. Why don't you prove to me that the earth is flat? If one were to travel around the world and not make any u turns, where would he end up? Somewhere no man has gone or somewhere he has seen before on his way?
Posted by Teemo 2 years ago
Teemo
To be honest, con won this debate. He is the only one who presented an argument valid enough. Pro just said the earth has an ovular shape, with no proof. Furthermore, conduct is tied since pro called con a maniac.
Posted by invisibledeity 2 years ago
invisibledeity
LOL idiot! ever hreard of PHOTOSHOP?? i could photoshop all kinds of crap and say its real
Posted by Youth 2 years ago
Youth
Seriously Con? Just because the Bible says the Earth is round means that it is actually flat? We might as well say the land is actually sea because the Bible says different. Also, your arguments are out of topic and yes, we do have proof of The Bible being true without using verses from it. Why don't you google image the earth from satellite view and see for yourself?
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Dumbass con went on a rant. End of story.
Vote Placed by Pitbull15 2 years ago
Pitbull15
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: What da fuq did I just read....
Vote Placed by zmikecuber 2 years ago
zmikecuber
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Actually, Pro never refuted Con's arguments.. I mean they were horrible, but technically you're not supposed to jsut say "these arguments are bad" and that's it. You're supposed to show why.
Vote Placed by saboosa 2 years ago
saboosa
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I think we all know why.
Vote Placed by Jevinigh 2 years ago
Jevinigh
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: What the heck did I just waste my time reading? was this Invisible guy even a real person? anyways none sensible arguments by con and lots of grammar mistakes aswell.
Vote Placed by queenofmayhem 2 years ago
queenofmayhem
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I think it's pretty self explanatory. Con had improper grammar, no relevant arguments, and was a complete dumbass. Points to Pro.
Vote Placed by MrJosh 2 years ago
MrJosh
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Just because, its freaking obvious.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
invisibledeityscienceNerd48Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had better arguments. Con loses points for using all caps in certain areas. Con also loses conduct points for acting like a jackass. Debaters at a minimum should know how to act with decorum.