The Instigator
Adam2
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
CuntedBunting
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

The first two "Shaft" movies were really funny nonsense

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Adam2
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/19/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 475 times Debate No: 56863
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Adam2

Pro

First round is for intro. In the first two "Shaft" film, it seems it was more for shock value and soap opera, to entertain those who wanted some actions. The only "Shaft" movie that had a real storyline was Shaft in Africa. And the modern day remake had a story too.
CuntedBunting

Con

I haven't seen the movies. Never heard of them actually. Sounds like a hardcore porno.
Debate Round No. 1
Adam2

Pro

The first "Shaft" film was a rather bizarre movie. It was like some of sorta shock value soap opera.
The second "Shaft" move attempted to have a story but rather fell into the same drama of the first film.
The third one was developed well. It was about a black man who fought for his people who were being enslaved and exploited.
The first and second were more like music videos, stupid ones at that.
CuntedBunting

Con

CuntedBunting forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Adam2

Pro

The first two movies were rather cheap. The second one was only slightly better than the first, but compared to the third, they both seemed like cheap shock value kind of entertainment.
CuntedBunting

Con

CuntedBunting forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Adam2

Pro

I rest my case
CuntedBunting

Con

CuntedBunting forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 3 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Adam2CuntedBuntingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Full forfeit by Con. Crude humor in his replies as well. Pro takes this for a clear victory.