The Instigator
MiaJones
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Conspiracy_Solver
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points

The illuminate is real and they are trying to minipulate us.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Conspiracy_Solver
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/8/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 552 times Debate No: 66593
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (8)
Votes (3)

 

MiaJones

Con

I believe that illuminate is real and that they are trying to manipulate us.
Conspiracy_Solver

Pro

Now since I'm starting my new hobby/profile as a conspiracy solver I ACCEPT

I'll let my opponent go first.
Debate Round No. 1
MiaJones

Con

I'm new too, but that shouldn't stop you from doing anything. Anyway another mistake with my position. Illuminate is a real devil worshipping group of people that are trying to get us to believe that they are right about the way we are supposed to live.
Conspiracy_Solver

Pro

Hello I'm glad a debate started on some conspiracy right when I deleted my profile and restarted! On with the debate!!!

Definition of Illuminati:

Illuminati- a Bavarian secret society founded in 1776, organized like the Freemasons

First, I'd like to give a brief history lesson on the term "Illuminati". This term was first used in the 18th century when the "Bavarian Illuminati" formed. Their main purpose was to promote women's rights and gender equality.

With that being said, WHY and HOW is the term "Illuminati" tied to a worldwide control group that controls most governments? Also, the term "Illuminati" was first used in the 18th century. Yet, a common theory of the Illuminati is that they have been around since the beginning of humanity. That makes no sense! How could that have been a term in the beginning of humanity when it was a term created much later. PLEASE EXPLAIN WORLD!!!

1. The Illuminati is a secret organization.
Hmm...that's real interesting, considering if you were to survey 50 people on the street, at least 45 of them would be able to tell you what the Illuminati supposedly is. So, how is that secretive? It's not! Even celebrities that are supposedly in the Illuminati don't keep it secret, flashing the Illuminati signs. The bottom line is, if the Illuminati did exist, they would try a little harder to keep it secret, and obviously, that's not the case.

Secondly, and this is just a personal theory, but celebrities most likely only use those signs to generate publicity from people unwise enough to do their research on the Illuminati and come to a conclusion that it is a false theory. Yes it's negative publicity, but it's still publicity, and publicity means more money in the pocket.

4. Zionists and Free-masons are predominantly involved with the Illuminati and use the power of Satan to help them.

Let's start out with the Free-masons. The Free-masonry isn't a group that even focuses on religion. It is a group that has to do with stone masonry. It includes people who are Christian, Catholic, Jewish, Buddhist, Athiest, Agnostic, and others. How does this have to do with Stan. It doesn't.

Now Zionists aren't Satan worshippers either. Zionists are a branch of the Jewish religion. Another history lesson:

Anywhere from 7-2 BC, Jesus Christ was born. He was the Son of God sent to Earth. However, some believed that he was the son of god, some didn't. Those who believed he was the son of God joined him and formed the Christian religion. Those who didn't believe he was the son of God obviously didn't follow him, and they remained Jewish.

That is mine for now!
Debate Round No. 2
MiaJones

Con

MiaJones forfeited this round.
Conspiracy_Solver

Pro

Vote for me if you want to. Now if he does start or she do not put your answer as ff I want to still try if they come back.
Debate Round No. 3
MiaJones

Con

MiaJones forfeited this round.
Conspiracy_Solver

Pro

Nvm vote for me.
Debate Round No. 4
MiaJones

Con

MiaJones forfeited this round.
Conspiracy_Solver

Pro

Conspiracy_Solver forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by MiaJones 2 years ago
MiaJones
screw you 2evil
Posted by 2Evil 2 years ago
2Evil
You spelled Illuminati and manipulate wrong.
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
I know it's not real, lol, that's why I took the other one where he is Pro.
Posted by Conspiracy_Solver 2 years ago
Conspiracy_Solver
It wouldn't be 0 BC just 0 please tell me you know just 0!!!
Posted by Vajrasattva-LeRoy 2 years ago
Vajrasattva-LeRoy
As far as I'm aware, the Illuminati don't have anything to do with Devil Worship.
Just about everybody's trying to manipulate everybody else. So?

My name wasn't Jesus-
I had a Hebrew name, pronounced Yeshua.
It was my BODY that was born around 0 B.C.
I believed back then that I was the son of God, but I wasn't.
It wasn't the people who believed that I was the son of God,
who believed in me, etc. , who formed Christianity.
I, my teachings, formed Christianity.
Many people who didn't believe that I was the son of God weren't Jewish, at all.
Judaism wasn't the only religion back then.
Many religions have existed for a long time.
Posted by Conspiracy_Solver 2 years ago
Conspiracy_Solver
Blade of Truth I say its not real and I'll prove it.
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Oh, and I'll take this debate once you correct your position from Con to Pro
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
If you believe they are real, then you should be in the "Pro" position, not the "Con" position. When you are Con it means you are 'against' the motion, which you seem to be supporting - thus you are Pro.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
MiaJonesConspiracy_SolverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: The debaters here argue for their opposite sides, so I'll pretend that there's nothing wrong with that, given that it's equal. Pro's counter-arguments went uncontested, and thus wins him/her arguments. Conduct to Pro for Con's round forfeits.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
MiaJonesConspiracy_SolverTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfetiture
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
MiaJonesConspiracy_SolverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was really Pro and vice versa. Having said that, "Pro"was the only one who made an argument. Pro also ff less.