The individual(s) who have voted for my opponent ought not to have.
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
omelet
| Started: | 12/12/2009 | Category: | Politics |
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 821 times | Debate No: | 10435 |
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (11)
Votes (10)
 Pro My opponent and I are tied (as of the posting of this round) And due to the fact that he not only forfeited one but two rounds, never refuted a single argument, Never gave the courtsey to comment, or anything of the sort. Their is no reason he should have the amount of votes he currently has. Thank you.  Con By voting for himself, he would be making it slightly more likely that he would win or tie that debate rather than lose. 2. I should have voted for beastboy838. I have, and I should have, since it gives me a better chance to win this debate due to having an extra contention. 3. First two vote categories. Those who agreed with beastboy838 before or after the debate should have voted for him in those categories if they wished to be honest. |
 |
|
Pro 1. there are multiple opponents, not addressed this. We are debating on the morality of the decisions and because they have not conformed to the conduct of rightness, making the fair and right decision. he should have received no votes. 2. Look to intro Extend all points from PRO Con My opponent has given no moral standard to base his claims on, and he has not defined ought in any specific sense. By some moral systems, it is moral to act selfishly and immoral to act unselfishly. Even ignoring #3, my opponent has failed to show that either beastboy838 or myself ought not have voted for beastboy838. |
 |
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by omelet 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Vote Placed by studentathletechristian8 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Vote Placed by mongeese 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Mixer 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by True2GaGa 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Nails 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Koopin 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Vote Placed by Cherymenthol 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by wjmelements 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Vote Placed by oceanix 3 years ago
| Cherymenthol | omelet | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 1 |
The problem is that debates that have a forfeit aren't shown on the front page when they end, so you're unlikely to get many people reading the debate and voting. He has 7 points probably because he voted for himself in all categories, which is 7 points total.
What about this debate? I'm not going to start another to debate but please help me out here read and give feedback.
===
Agree before/after: CON/CON
Conduct: TIE
Spelling: CON
Arguments: CON
Sources: TIE
RFD
===
Neither participant had particularly bad conduct or used any scholarly sources to back up claims.
PRO had several spelling and grammar mistakes, which is significant for the length of the debate.
PRO failed to show why no one should have voted for his opponent on the "who did you agree with before the debate" and "who did you agree with after the debate" categories, even by his implied standard of honesty. That was enough to negate the resolution.