The Instigator
RatsGalore
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Ragnar
Con (against)
Winning
28 Points

The natural selection

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Ragnar
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/4/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 841 times Debate No: 43372
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

RatsGalore

Pro

will you win or will I win?

It's all natural selection.
Ragnar

Con

As defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary "a natural process that results in the survival and reproductive success of individuals or groups best adjusted to their environment and that leads to the perpetuation of genetic qualities best suited to that particular environment" [1].

Nothing on this website fits that definition, as it is not connected to survival or reproductive success. Thus pro's argument fails.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
Debate Round No. 1
RatsGalore

Pro

RatsGalore forfeited this round.
Ragnar

Con

My case has not been contested, pro fails, vote con...

On the other hand, assuming I mistook the intent of the resolution: I would still win, as evidenced by pro having zero eyes, and me having either two or four (as evidenced by the pictures of us). A mouth is also a useful trait which pro lacks, and I have an obvious abundance of.
Debate Round No. 2
RatsGalore

Pro

RatsGalore forfeited this round.
Ragnar

Con

Vote con.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by chengste 3 years ago
chengste
RatsGaloreRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: UGH
Vote Placed by InfiniteBears 3 years ago
InfiniteBears
RatsGaloreRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is sad....
Vote Placed by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
OtakuJordan
RatsGaloreRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Full forfeit.
Vote Placed by Kreakin 3 years ago
Kreakin
RatsGaloreRagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro Ff and apparently misunderstood his own resolution. Pro loses on grammar as didn't start sentence with a capital.