The new era of Rap Battle: Video Rap Battle
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 11 votes the winner is...
snelld7
| Started: | 9/2/2009 | Category: | Entertainment |
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 4,803 times | Debate No: | 9397 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (89)
Votes (11)
|
As the resolution states. This is a rap battle like all the others, BUT...
this one is with VIDEO!!!!!111!!1! (That's a meme, don't you count it against my spelling and grammar) The rules are simple: 1) Video only, no text or comment posting 2) Video must last at least 2 minutes, but need not last any more than 4 Steps: 1) Record yourself rapping. 2) Upload it to youtube. 3) Post the link in your argument. Judging is easy: Change the voting collumns like so: Conduct --------------> Audio Quality Spelling/Grammar ---> Disses Arguments ------------> Actual Quality of Lyrics Sources ----------------> Rhythm and Flow Video/Audio battles let you analyze more of the rap, so I hope you all vote, and "like" the debate
Aight... let's go Charlie... |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
It's not pronounced "Snelled"... Snell-D (David Snell Jr..add me on facebook) is how you'd say it. For instance if your username was your full name it would be DangerC. But anyways.. No, you can't win if you assume I won round 2 and 3 (round 1 was a no post round) because that only leaves 4 and 5. Best is a tie. But hey, I'm willing to throw out round 2 and 3 (Forfeit for me this round as well and my 2nd round also). That puts you up 1-0 Charlie. Only way I can win is if I win both of the last rounds. Good luck and thanks for the debate. Hope you post fast, have a football game tomorrow and would love to post right after!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Good battle, thanks to all of you.
Thanks, good luck charlie |
![]() |
11 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by alwaz4dam 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 2 |
Vote Placed by Xacto01 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Vote Placed by radioactivepotatoman 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by dobsondebator 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Danielle 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by thejudgeisgod 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 4 |
Vote Placed by untitled_entity 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Vote Placed by Charlie_Danger 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by snelld7 3 years ago
| Charlie_Danger | snelld7 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |




















1. Creativity: Pro
2. Rhyme Structure: Con
3. Insults: Pro
4. Flow: Pro
5. Delivery: Con
6. Lyrics: Pro
Furthermore, if you were going to delete parts that you deemed "cop-outs" then why don't you just grab a stopwatch and subtract all the space between words and sentences that we said, since it is just a way to fill a time requirement, huh?
Seriously? Wowwwwww. It's a rap battle for god's sake....Gladly, I'd be happy to let you know that there probably wasn't a single round that you rapped for two minutes. I was just leaving an RFD, if you want to complain further go ahead.
After all, I'm not commenting questioning people about how they said you were winning or you were better... or even that you were "funny" and made them laugh with unrelated publicity stunts... (as if that mattered) lol
"Charlie used most of his time with either phone calls or yelling matches which to me seemed like a cop out of not being able to fill the time requirement"
I find it annoying that you ignored the parts he wasted.
Furthermore, if you were going to delete parts that you deemed "cop-outs" then why don't you just grab a stopwatch and subtract all the space between words and sentences that we said, since it is just a way to fill a time requirement, huh?
I give it all to SnellD except for quality cause it was really hard for me to hear him, but then again, I'm hearing impaired so I'll leave it at a tie instead of points to Charlie_Danger.
Good rap battle, period. However Charlie used most of his time with either phone calls or yelling matches which to me seemed like a cop out of not being able to fill the time requirement.
I can't register my vote but if I was to post an RFD according to the guidelines provided it would be even closer as I think Dangerous C just about wins on disses and overall lyrical content was pretty even.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record I was disapointed that you both chose to rap without a backing track but I still enjoyed the battle.