The Instigator
ankitkawade
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
CharlesWhitman
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

The parliament should have a representative from teenage group.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/29/2011 Category: Education
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,016 times Debate No: 17321
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

ankitkawade

Pro

they make various laws t our well being and education. but how many times do they bother to ask us what do we feel? the parliament should have a teenage representative.
CharlesWhitman

Con

What's one teenager going to do to change anything? It's not like one teenager could possibly represent all teenagers. Plus, teenagers are too young to know what's good for themselves. That's why they need their parents, especially a dad to smack 'em into shape. Teenagers only think they know what's good for them when they're mating like rats and snorting and injecting all sorts of drugs. If anything teenagers need less representation and need to be put in their place!
Debate Round No. 1
ankitkawade

Pro

ankitkawade forfeited this round.
CharlesWhitman

Con

Well, I can't argue anything when the opponent doesn't actually give a reason for why adding a teenager to parliament would actually be good for all teenagers.
Debate Round No. 2
ankitkawade

Pro

ankitkawade forfeited this round.
CharlesWhitman

Con

What a fool!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
ankitkawadeCharlesWhitmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by randolph7 6 years ago
randolph7
ankitkawadeCharlesWhitmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Purely idiotic.
Vote Placed by ApostateAbe 6 years ago
ApostateAbe
ankitkawadeCharlesWhitmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeit