The plane impact with the WTC
Debate Rounds (3)
Open link below to view the impact of the plane in slow motion.
Also all planes create a wing vortex from the trailing edge of the wing tips acting like a horizontal twister. Which should have been clearly seen in the smoke from the fire ball after impact. This is definitely missing and should not be in both impacts . Why?
Open the link below to view a wing vortex.
'The 9-11 videos of the planes impacting the WTC Towers shows both planes melting into the towers without slowing down and not even a bolt or piece of carbon fiber falling to the ground below. This violates the fundamental 3rd law of motion without a equal and opposite reaction. I challenge anyone still believing the official conspiracy theory to explain how a reaction would also not be occur if the plane was standing still and the building smashed into it traveling at 500 mph?'
The official conspiracy theory? I was under the impression you were the conspiracy theorist. The 3rd law of motion , just
to recap is 'Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
This picture clearly shows the damage caused to the Twin towers by this equal and opposite reaction.
The plane flowed into the hole fluidly. In your heads-I-win-tails-you-lose logic, if even one part of the event were not true then therfore there must have been a conspiracy.
'Also all planes create a wing vortex from the trailing edge of the wing tips acting like a horizontal twister. Which should have been clearly seen in the smoke from the fire ball after impact. This is definitely missing and should not be in both impacts . Why?'
I'm going to choose to ignore the double negative, and assume that you mean that it should be there. A wing vortex of an airplane is created by the plane's forward movement. This cannot occur if , like in the Twin Tower incident the wings are sheared off, and have no forward movement. The direction that the wing vortexes face is directly behind the wings, the plane was at a 20 degree angle. Therefore, no wing vortex. QED.
Occam's razor. What is more likely, that there was a terrorist atrocity commited, or that hundreds of thousands of people are participating in a conspiracy theory. Who would we suspect? The government? Point of reference, not including the post office has over 1.9 million employees.
In the face of the hard cold facts, I challenge my opponent to refute them.
 Popular Mechanics, debunking 9/11 myths, 2002
RUN4ACES forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.