The Instigator
Iamnotatroll
Pro (for)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
9spaceking
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

The reason Jews have big noses is because air is free

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
9spaceking
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/29/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,043 times Debate No: 66007
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

Iamnotatroll

Pro

Don't even try to debate this. I am the best debater of all timez
9spaceking

Con

Accepted. Pro has to prove the resolution.
Debate Round No. 1
Iamnotatroll

Pro

Why do I have to prove or? It's pretty obvious evolution bruh
9spaceking

Con

Evolution ain't true. Evolution is only something that happens in Pokemon.

[source: http://www.reddit.com...]

As Pokemons aren't Jews, and only Pokemon can evolute to have big noses, then Jews cannot have big noses.
Debate Round No. 2
Iamnotatroll

Pro

But we all are Pokemon

Muslims are the type of pokemon that explode and Jews are all the pokemon Phsyduck so they use that money move all the time

Facebook is the pokedex and Mark Zuckerberg is Proffesor Oak
9spaceking

Con

Incorrect. My opponent has offered no sources or evidence to prove his words. Muslims are not Exploud, Jews aren't Phsyduck, Facebook ain't the pokedex and Mark is not Professor. Only Exploud is Exploud; only Phsyduck is Phsyduck. We are not the Pokemon world, this is Earth! I win, vote me.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by MiaJones 2 years ago
MiaJones
this is a funny topic.
Posted by cheyennebodie 2 years ago
cheyennebodie
Instead of being jealous of the economics of the Jews, learn from them. That is what a smart gentile would co.
Posted by Iamnotatroll 2 years ago
Iamnotatroll
What do you mean I have no sources? You blindly say evolution isn't real then give me a link to reddit that shows pokemon evolutions which doesn't support at all why evolution isn't real.
Posted by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
"evolute"
it's called "evolve"... -_-
Posted by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
not racist at all...lol
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
Iamnotatroll9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Since this doesn't claim to be a troll debate, and Pro's name says he/she is not a troll, I assume this isn't a troll debate. Therefore, Pro offered no evidence to support his/her position, and as such didn't meet BOP
Vote Placed by johnlubba 2 years ago
johnlubba
Iamnotatroll9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made a statement which Con didn't necessarily truthfully rebuttal, So Pro's trollish argument still stands I see no reason for Pro to provide sources for such a ridiculous statement, I base the winner of this debate on who was funnier and that was Pro. Nine day's left for the voting period to close so I doubt my vote will effect the winner, good luck to both.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Iamnotatroll9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: LMAO, wow. Okay, conduct tied - Pro's joke was funny, and Con's response regarding pokemon was equally funny - neither stepped over the bounds for me, thus both had good conduct. S&G - Con. Pro made continuous spelling and grammar errors throughout the debate compared to Con who had much less. Arguments - Con. Pro failed to provide any proof to affirm his claim. This was a clear failure on Pro's part to maintain the burden of proof. Con presented challenges that effectively showed the faults in Pro's claim, and Pro failed to overcome those faults with any valid reasoning or proof. For this, Con wins arguments. Sources - Con. Pro failed to utilize sources in this debate whereas Con did. This is a clear win for Con.