The Instigator
mynameisjonas
Pro (for)
mynameisjonas
Winning
29 Points
The Contender
Ragnar_Rahl
Con (against)
Ragnar_Rahl
Losing
24 Points

The revenge of hoopla

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Started: 6/25/2008 Category: News
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 918 times Debate No: 4503
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (14)

 

mynameisjonas

Pro

Why were there no debates in the challenge period before I posted this one? I demand to know! If i don't find out within an hour I shall convert to Pacific/Islander religous beliefs. Yeah. Youkilis. He's on da wed sokks. Not the red sox. Da wed sokks. German folklore spelling.

Also i believe that my argument is grammatically correct. So stop it debate.org.

Someone needs to answer my question please. Weenis.

I already expanded my opening argument. Fine, then I shall babble.

My pancakes are spuds. My pancakes are spuds. Hidy-ho my pancakes are spuds. Anyway I think that my rightious beliefs are only valid in Spanglish.
Report this Argument
Ragnar_Rahl

Con

hoopla:
–noun Informal.
1.bustling excitement or activity; commotion; hullabaloo; to-do.
2.sensational publicity; ballyhoo.
3.speech or writing intended to mislead or to obscure an issue.

Revenge:
–noun
4.the act of revenging; retaliation for injuries or wrongs; vengeance.
5.something done in vengeance.
6.the desire to revenge; vindictiveness.
7.an opportunity to retaliate or gain satisfaction.

Hoopla, you see, is an event or state of affairs. It is incapable of maintaining injuries, and thus incapable of avenging them. It has no desires. It has no relevance to the word "retaliate." Whether you are attempting to argue that the revenge of hoopla is going to occur or that it is desirable, you lose because it is impossible and even desires ought to be based on reality.

As for your question, it's because YOU failed to post another debate before this one. If you had, it would not be true that there was no debate in the challenge area before you posted this one.
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 1
mynameisjonas

Pro

Your points have proved to be very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, valid, Ranger Ralph. Or is it Rudolph Rash? Ah well. Anywho, my rebuttal will not only be well thought out, but detailed and thorough. Prepare to be amazed.

Report this Argument
Ragnar_Rahl

Con

Oh dear, the amazing pain! I've been waiting for this pain! The delicious agony of someone demonstrating that I am wrong! How amazingly thorough, logical, original! "Insert here!" That's never been done before! That's not possible! I'm dying! No!!!

http://i.peperonity.com...

http://www.videoservicecorp.com...
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 2
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 1 year ago
Man-is-good
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: mynameisjonas never adequately responded to Ragnar_Rahl's post or rebuttal (which effectively pointed out the weakness of his resolution and case).
Vote Placed by SexyLatina 3 years ago
SexyLatina
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by philosphical 4 years ago
philosphical
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Jamcke 4 years ago
Jamcke
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Xera 4 years ago
Xera
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by lorca 4 years ago
lorca
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 4 years ago
Logical-Master
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by gahbage 4 years ago
gahbage
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by blondesrule502 4 years ago
blondesrule502
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Puck 4 years ago
Puck
mynameisjonasRagnar_RahlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
12Next »