The Instigator
PhilosophicalPerson
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Lazarius
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

The suggestion that time existed forever must be true

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/31/2013 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 360 times Debate No: 43194
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

PhilosophicalPerson

Pro

Rules

1. Con must argue in favor of the resolution that the suggestion that time existed forever is indeed, false.

2. No trolling,

3. Regardless of whether or not you have consent to copy somebody else's work, you can not do so.

4. First round is for acceptance only.

Failure to follow these rules will result in a 7-point forfeiture.

Definition

Time - Time is a dimension in which events can be ordered from the past through the present into the future,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Sources

http://en.wikipedia.org...
About Time: Einstein's Unfinished Revolution, Paul Davies, p. 31, Simon & Schuster, 1996, ISBN 978-0684818221
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...
http://www.yourdictionary.com...
http://ahdictionary.com...
http://www.merriam-webster.com...
http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
PhilosophicalPerson

Pro

I thank Con for accepting this debate.

Contentions

In accordance to the definition, without it, NOTHING can happen. And I exaggerate that point.

So, if nothing can happen without time, not even time could come into existence.
Lazarius

Con

Oh, darn, I concede. That is a really good point there.

By the way, there is no future and past, there is only present.
Debate Round No. 2
PhilosophicalPerson

Pro

Alright. My opponent has conceded that he loses the debate. Therefore, I win. Vote for Pro!

Rebuttals

"By the way, there is no future and past, there is only present."

Incorrect. Without future, in particular, time wouldn't be moving. And it is. Future validates the past. Without the past, no events would pass.
Lazarius

Con

Lazarius forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
PhilosophicalPerson

Pro

Con , unfortunately, forfeited R3.

Vote Pro!
Lazarius

Con

Lazarius forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.