The topic says it all as we fore. The third world countries are now suffering from numerous problems all around them. In this case, there should not be any alternative rather than somebody like Adlof Hitler. Because as we have seen in his reign, he led Germany to simply an invincible position, in terms of many criteria. He not only mad e them hugely huge in military equipment, but also could bring a steady development process. And in these countries, you cannot afford to show the indulgence to let the power be in democracy, as people mostly being illiterate, do not care for these. So, all you need to have is to have somebody like him to create a disciplined system and to have somebody whom everybody cannot but pay heed to. That's it, let's take the challenge.......!!
Why wouldn't you want to have someone like Pope Francis or Angela Merkel? Or anyone who hasn't killed 6 million people because of their religious views? This whole argument is completely idiotic in the sense of that there are millions of people much much better than Adolf Hitler ever could and would be. He started a monstrous war that he had no hope in winning after he started invading Russia and then proceeded to murder his whole family as well as himself. Whats would stop him from starting another war? Would you like him to be the leader of Syria or Iraq?