The Instigator
Spartan136
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
wiploc
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

The united states should ban the use of armed drones

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/19/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 997 times Debate No: 27370
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)

 

Spartan136

Con

Ban- Officially or legally prohibit
Drone- A pilotless aircraft operated by remote control
Good Evening to my opponent! Round One is for acceptance and clarification of said debate.
Round 2 is specifically for construction of cases.
Round 3 is for clash.
Round 4 is for rebuttal and closing comments.Rules:No debater shall be disrespected in any way.No religion shall take part of this debate. Philosophies have almost nothing to do with this debate, and should remain outside of this debate.
wiploc

Pro

I don't know of any argument against drones. I know people are against them; I just don't know why. So this will be interesting.

Debate Round No. 1
Spartan136

Con

Spartan136 forfeited this round.
wiploc

Pro

Spartan forfeited his round, so I'm forfeiting mine right with him.
Hopefully, we can forfeit the rest of it away, and have no votes
either way.
Debate Round No. 2
Spartan136

Con

Spartan136 forfeited this round.
wiploc

Pro

Let this be a tie.
Debate Round No. 3
Spartan136

Con

My opponent and i have agreed to postpone this debate, so do not vote on this item. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 4
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by wiploc 4 years ago
wiploc
I don't think drones should be banned. I notice now that you style yourself "Con," which may mean that you don't think they should be banned either. If that's the case, lets call this a tie, and let the time run out.
Posted by Spartan136 4 years ago
Spartan136
i MEANT that no one should bring their religous views into the said debate. Also, one does not need to look to philosophies to negate or affirm this resolution, one only needs to use empirical data and evidence
Posted by RoyLatham 4 years ago
RoyLatham
"No religion shall take part of this debate."

Well. I am not now a religion, but I reserve the right to become one in the future.
Posted by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
Why does philosophy take no part in the debate?
Posted by Smithereens 4 years ago
Smithereens
This debate is really awkward, you should restate the resolution as 'The United States should not ban the use of armed drones.' And then go pro. It hurts my eyes to see Con start off with Pro ending. Also, the instigators should have the BoP, you are the instigator here.
No votes have been placed for this debate.