The Instigator
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Pro (for)
Winning
29 Points
The Contender
Bradley_Steven_Perry
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

The user known as Bradley_Steven_Perry should be banned.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/10/2014 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 759 times Debate No: 43693
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (8)
Votes (6)

 

SPENCERJOYAGE14

Pro

Full resolution: The user as Bradley_Steven_Perry should be banned because he has not shown any substantial evidence that he is the actor shown on this “extremely credible website”: http://en.wikipedia.org...


A few things to know before this debate round begins:


1) There will be four rounds of this debate

2) The voting period will be one month

3) We will each have 72 hours to debate

4) We will be allotted 10,000 characters for each round

5) First round for acceptance

6) Second round both Pro and Con will present their cases

7) Third round for rebuttals

8) Fourth round will be for voting issues

9) No use of profanity will be allowed

10) Forfeit will equal a 7 point loss on that opponent’s side

11) There is to be expected mild slandering in debate arguments

12) If Con does not accept this debate he will be conceding that he is indeed a pedophile and a fake.


A few terms to clarify before we debate:


1) Bradley Steven Perry an actor on Disney XD [1]

2) User: a person or thing that uses something [2] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

3) Known: generally accepted as something specified [3] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

4) Should: Used to express obligation or duty [4] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...

5) Banned: A prohibition imposed by law or official decree [5] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...

6) Shown: to cause or allow to be seen; exhibit; display. [6] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...

7) Substantial: Considerable in importance, value, degree, amount, or extent [7] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...

8) Evidence: A thing or things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment [8] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...

9) “Extremely Credible Website”: Sarcasm

Thank you and I look forward to debating this intense resolution.

Bradley_Steven_Perry

Con

I accept your challenge
Debate Round No. 1
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Pro


“When I see you, I think "I wonder which face she sees when she looks into the mirror.”


R13; C. JoyBell C.


You may have noticed that a few Disney actors and actresses have been signing up on debate.org. You might be naive and gullible and think they are real, or you might be very skeptical and realize it is most likely true that they are fakes.


Harm one: Faking accounts of celebs hurt their careers. http://www.newindianexpress.com...


Mandate: Bradley_Steven_Perry shall prove he is who he says he is.


Advantages: We will know who he is and it will prove he is or is not a pedophile.


Bradley_Steven_Perry

Con

Bradley_Steven_Perry forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Pro

Oh well, I guess I win.

Bradley_Steven_Perry

Con

What makes you win already? The debate isn't over yet. And I will prove that I'm the real Bradley Steven Perry
Debate Round No. 3
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Pro


Voting issues:

1) Forfeit
Rules plainly state that we cannot forfeit.

2) No case submitted

There was nothing to debate in this debate.

3) Fourth round is only for voting issues

Bradley_Steven_Perry cannot bring up a case now in the last round because I would not be able to rebut anything which would be a abuse on this debate.
Bradley_Steven_Perry

Con

Bradley_Steven_Perry forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Yeah, I procrastinated and wrote that case in 5 minutes.
Posted by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
@DudeStop:

Had Con brought that up in his own defense, that would be applicable, but Con made no argument whatsoever, which in general makes the one who DID present a case have the winning case, even when it's not very strong.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
I'm going to give him arguments and you conduct if you cannot give a violation to our precious TOS...
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
You have not shown how he violates the terms and service.
Posted by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Bradley Stevens Perry got scared and ran away.
Posted by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Cmon Spencer, you can win this.
Posted by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Ikr?
Posted by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Good idea for a challenge. I've often wondered what's with the Disney Channel usernamed people trying to pretend they are famous actors.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
SPENCERJOYAGE14Bradley_Steven_PerryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
SPENCERJOYAGE14Bradley_Steven_PerryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: FF all points to pro as stated in rules.
Vote Placed by dtaylor971 3 years ago
dtaylor971
SPENCERJOYAGE14Bradley_Steven_PerryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: All 7 points to pro because of double forfeiture, and the fact that con actually got banned XD
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
SPENCERJOYAGE14Bradley_Steven_PerryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for the forfeits. Sourcing because Pro actually had some, while Con did not; Con can hardly be said to have even shown up for this. As to arguments, while I don't think that Pro's case was a compelling one, in the face of no rebuttal whatsoever from Con, it stands, and so I award arguments to Pro. As always, happy to clarify anything in this RFD.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
SPENCERJOYAGE14Bradley_Steven_PerryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeit
Vote Placed by Swagmasterpoopoo 3 years ago
Swagmasterpoopoo
SPENCERJOYAGE14Bradley_Steven_PerryTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited two rounds. con did not present any arguments, rebuttals our sources. Easy win for pro