The Instigator
imarecliner
Pro (for)
Tied
19 Points
The Contender
imabench
Con (against)
Tied
19 Points

The user known as imabench is a knight

Do you like this debate?NoYes-25
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/28/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,026 times Debate No: 23257
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (25)
Votes (9)

 

imabench

Con

Now what the f*ck is this?

F*ck it im going to argue that I am not a knight, Pro must prove that I am a knight, yatta yatta yatta state your case
Debate Round No. 1
imarecliner

Pro

I am a God. As you read this you will think of your mother, then your father, and finally of the opposite sex. The evidence for my mystical Godism is abundant, the Gospel of imarecliner is glorious indeed.

Comrade imabench is hereby declared a Knight of the DDO fief, by the power invested in me by virtue of being a god I grant thee knighthood and kinship. May the great ones smile upon you as you bring glory and honor among us. Death to the German invader!

The resolution is correct, as I, a God, gave imabench knighthood.
imabench

Con

"I am a God"

Oh lord its going to be one of these debates.....

Definition of God:
"The one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe."
http://dictionary.reference.com...

So you need proof before anyone can believe you, I for one dont think you are god because someone else is already God.
http://www.debate.org...

"The evidence for my mystical Godism is abundant, the Gospel of imarecliner is glorious indeed."

Bullsh*t, the gospel of imarecliner was lost when the Romans sacked Egypt and burnt the Library of Alexandria to the ground. Nobody knows anything about what was in the texts and the one person who claims to have wrote the gospel of imarecliner was an ancient Egyptian male prostitute who has been discredited.

"Comrade imabench is hereby declared a Knight of the DDO fief, by the power invested in me by virtue of being a god I grant thee knighthood and kinship. May the great ones smile upon you as you bring glory and honor among us. Death to the German invader!"

Gods do not knight people, they bless them and grant them saint hood. Kings, Queens, and Monarchs of European countries can grant knighthood but Gods have other means of recognizing individuals.

http://en.wikipedia.org...

"The resolution is correct, as I, a God, gave imabench knighthood."

Gods dont knight people though :)

The resolution is negated.
Debate Round No. 2
imarecliner

Pro

My opponent fails to understand that I am A god, not the only one. Monotheism is a falsehood. It is true that the account he gave is also a God. He is reading this right now, and planning to vote for me.

He gives a falsehood, the gospel of imarecliner is indeed thriving, just look in your pants.

I am a God, I can do whatever I want. Imabench is knighted.
imabench

Con

No evidence given, disregards my arguments, failed to meet his BOP, vote con and lts get the worst debate ever over with
Debate Round No. 3
25 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by fire_wings 5 months ago
fire_wings
-25 legendary
Posted by thett3 3 years ago
thett3
Hello
Posted by daytonanerd 3 years ago
daytonanerd
Ima, why didn't you just point out that lords are the ones who knight people under feudalism, and not Gods?
Posted by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
Now it's at -24
Posted by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
a negative -19 debate got 9 votes and still got a tie......

I love this site XD
Posted by Wallstreetatheist 4 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
-18
whoa
Posted by Chrysippus 4 years ago
Chrysippus
RFD:

Conduct: Con. Pro used abusive language, claiming Con deliberately lied.

SP/G: Con. Pro's first round argument was "Yes" with no punctuation; a sentence fragment. This is unacceptable grammar.

Arguments: Con. Pro failed to prove that he was a God, giving only personal opinions. No basis for his ability to grant knighthood was given.

Sources: Con, for actually having sources.
Posted by Microsuck 4 years ago
Microsuck
imabench, this is -15 http://www.debate.org...
Posted by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
Actually -13. lol I'm an idiot http://www.debate.org...
Posted by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
That one only got -10 unless im looking at the wrong one
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by Wallstreetatheist 4 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro proved he's GOD. Also, Con had sources and new duh lanquaqe he had been spoken on da dabeight.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's only argument against pro being god is that there is already another god. He debunked this by saying monotheism is false, thus making it possible for multiple gods. As a god, being omnipotent, he would be able to knight a person. Sir imabench of DDO.
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 4 years ago
Chrysippus
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: RFD in comments.
Vote Placed by royalpaladin 4 years ago
royalpaladin
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Brilliant trolling :)
Vote Placed by ConservativePolitico 4 years ago
ConservativePolitico
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: God or not, imarecliner clearly knighted imabench making imabench a knight in the court of whatever imarecliner might be, God nonwithstanding.
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 4 years ago
PeacefulChaos
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter- there were no sources used on Pro's part.
Vote Placed by 1Historygenius 4 years ago
1Historygenius
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: All hail God!
Vote Placed by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: HE IS GOD
Vote Placed by bossyburrito 4 years ago
bossyburrito
imareclinerimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: There is only one God. That would be Harrison Ford.