The Instigator
muslimnomore
Pro (for)
Tied
10 Points
The Contender
IntellectualPerson
Con (against)
Tied
10 Points

The winner of this debate is an idiot

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/18/2013 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 779 times Debate No: 42614
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (5)

 

muslimnomore

Pro

If you win this debate, you're an idiot. If I win this debate, I'm an idiot. If neither of us win this debate, we're both idiots. The loser of this debate is also an idiot. The world is full of idiots. You're an idiot, I'm an idiot. We're all idiots.

But if you participate in this debate, you are a very huge idiot. Your idiocy rivals that of the cast of Honey BooBoo, Jersey Shore, and Keeping up with the Kardashians.

So, do yourself a favour, and do not participate.

Definitions:
Idiot
n
Anyone who participates in this debate.
IntellectualPerson

Con

Rebuttals:

"If you win this debate, you're an idiot. If I win this debate, I'm an idiot. If neither of us win this debate, we're both idiots. The loser of this debate is also an idiot. The world is full of idiots. You're an idiot, I'm an idiot. We're all idiots.

But if you participate in this debate, you are a very huge idiot. Your idiocy rivals that of the cast of Honey BooBoo, Jersey Shore, and Keeping up with the Kardashians.

So, do yourself a favour, and do not participate
"

Actually, that is completely incorrect. The winner of this debate is most likely not one.

You are making guesses, however say it as if it is fact. How could you possibly know that?

"Definitions:
Idiot
n
Anyone who participates in this debate.
"

Also, I completely disagree with your definition of the word "idiot". As I have looked through the official dictionary, meriam webster, etc. that is not the definition of this word.

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Loveshismom 3 years ago
Loveshismom
Pro makes himself look like an idiot.
Posted by Sukhmeet 3 years ago
Sukhmeet
A meaningless debate, you both learned that both of you are idiots, I hope that both of you will not fail the next debate. Nice Idea though
Posted by TheLastMan 3 years ago
TheLastMan
The absurdity of this debate knows no bound.
Posted by Zx32 3 years ago
Zx32
That was cute.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
muslimnomoreIntellectualPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: votebomb
Vote Placed by TheAntidoter 3 years ago
TheAntidoter
muslimnomoreIntellectualPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con Does not Give PRo chance to challenge definition, therefore con moves goalposts. The winner of this debate is going to pro, and since con is an idiot since pro isn't by definition, then con's arguments fall. Con spells Merrian wrong, Is an idiot, thus losing conduct, and PRO has an argument backing the definition based on the resolution.
Vote Placed by dtaylor971 3 years ago
dtaylor971
muslimnomoreIntellectualPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: CON wins due to considerably better arguments than that of pro.
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 3 years ago
funwiththoughts
muslimnomoreIntellectualPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: The Con challenged Pro's definition but provided none of his own. Therefore it is assumed that Pro's definition is in fact valid. Under Pro's definition, it is impossible for Con to win, as the resolution is self-proving.
Vote Placed by TheAmazingAtheist1 3 years ago
TheAmazingAtheist1
muslimnomoreIntellectualPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: While Con actually argued, Pro simply made a guess.