The words "Under God" should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
SeelTheMan
| Started: | 4/10/2012 | Category: | Politics |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 905 times | Debate No: | 22705 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)
|
The words "Under God" should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance. Round 1 - Acceptance Round 2 - Arguments Round 3 - Rebuttals Opponent must accept these conditions. -No usage of wikipedia as a source. -Pro must prove why it is rational to remove the words "Under God" from the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. -Con must prove why it is irrational to remove the words "Under God" from the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. Good luck.
Good luck :) |
![]() |
The words "under God" should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.Thank you, and I would like my opponent to please only post arguments in round 2, and we may start rebuttals in round 3. ryanKim forfeited this round. |
![]() |
|
AS the negative. I am going to argue that it does not matter. 1. It is a saying. By law, you are not required to say the pledge. and now I will attack your case. n 1. They have no idea what they're saying. And in the event they do interpret the message of the pledge instead of just saying it verbatim like every other child, he is not required by law to recite the pledge. And it says under God... There are more than 1 god in this world (meaning multiple religions). and on that note, that's my attack for your 2nd argument. 2. You said yourself, the US wasn't founded on Christianity. So "god" in the pledge doesn't necessarily mean it's referring the christian god.. those are your assumptions. 3. Skip because that wasn't one of my arguments. 4. The US is under "god".. any god. and one of your arguments maybe there may be atheists. If they don't believe in a god, that's their business and their business alone. 5. The child is not required by law to say the pledge. 6. They pledge is not a law so the first amendment doesn't apply here. 7. It means the person saying the pledge is assuming the entire nation is united with the belief. And under the first amendment, they are free to express their ideas and have their own religion and thoughts. 8. Not required by law to say the pledge. They president is one person and can not speak for everyone. He was elected to run the country and it's affairs. Not to declare why the US is not a christian country. And sorry for the late responses. Do you want to make the same debate with these same arguments and have another round of arguments? |
![]() |
Post a Comment
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by SeelTheMan 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by KILLUMINATI 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by SeelTheMan 1 year ago

Report this Comment
Posted by KILLUMINATI 1 year ago

Report this Comment
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 1 year ago
| SeelTheMan | ryanKim | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for Con's forfeit. Arguments for Con's failure to present arguments until the last round, which make them inadmissible.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 1 year ago
| SeelTheMan | ryanKim | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: All arguments last round are unfair. Conduct for FF. new arguments last round ate invalid. Therefore pro wins.







