The Instigator
legodude123
Pro (for)
Winning
11 Points
The Contender
koon139
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

There are alot of problems with pokemon

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
legodude123
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/31/2013 Category: TV
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 955 times Debate No: 43190
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (3)

 

legodude123

Pro

you will go first my opponent
Debate Round No. 1
legodude123

Pro

Problems I have with it
pokemon says catch em all. What am I catching? Pokemon right oh course but guess how many there are. 649!!! where the heck will I get 649 pokeballs also you need more then that to catch a pokemon. There is too many pokemon and it gets confusing.
2# Ash is part of the reason. He has not aged and his pikachu still hasnt evolved basically he makes very stupid moves like why put a grass vs fire very stupid also to say that since his pokemon did not evolve why not focus on getting does stronger instead of switching and picking random pokemon that you can't evolve.
3# Why bother to even give pokemon a game of its own when it doesnt make sense. I dont understand why they have you going around the world to fight gym leader s when the game is about black and white
4# Legendary pokemon shouldn't be even there it just really makes no sense to even put them because they are a waste of pokeballs how would you get your hands on a legendary
There are more but they will be shared later
Here comes the hate
Before any of you pokemon fan boys complain " you suck" or " you dont needa catch em all" or " dont talk about ash like "
say what you want no point anyway
koon139

Con

My opponent is a Jew, signifying a heated conversation between a farming growth and a mini-saved plan. A plan deciding which one is which would definitely be vital; and without a vital, it is nevertheless a win-win situation where one would, despite not having the risks, preferrably, miss a scene where hopefully, the other, again, despite not having the risks, would be signifying or implying a hugely successful evaluation and conclusion. Mainly because of the points, it is unclear to whether a plan would be successful.

The following are vital for a success;
a 0.79 manter hole;
a 4.66 manter hole;
a 4.50-60 enciting mat type B/C
Debate Round No. 2
legodude123

Pro

Excuse me I am not jewiish and you dont go with the topic why pokemon has no problems
koon139

Con

My opponent makes us horny as every day. It is a signal to us all to finalize the result!
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Scarletphantomxx 1 year ago
Scarletphantomxx
Well they say "the more the merrier" digimon has more creatures than Pokemon btw although the majority of the originals are now recoloured
Posted by legodude123 3 years ago
legodude123
Lol he thought he will win when he provided no evidence
Posted by legodude123 3 years ago
legodude123
still alo
Posted by PatriotPerson 3 years ago
PatriotPerson
Actually bro, there are 721 pokemon.
Posted by legodude123 3 years ago
legodude123
ok
Posted by JustAnotherGuy 3 years ago
JustAnotherGuy
I would love to debate you on this, but the guy got it before me! If you want to challenge me I would be happy to oblige!
Posted by legodude123 3 years ago
legodude123
the only reason why there is so much cuz they add more each season
Posted by legodude123 3 years ago
legodude123
to me it goes down
Posted by JustAnotherGuy 3 years ago
JustAnotherGuy
In my opinion, pokemon has gotten better over the years. It has better graphics, music, stories, secondary characters, villians, and more. The only real problem it has is that the amount of pokemon gets confusing.
Posted by legodude123 3 years ago
legodude123
pokemon is not as good anymore oh yeah give me your question they will be answered
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
legodude123koon139Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con did absolutely nothing.
Vote Placed by Gohan12345 3 years ago
Gohan12345
legodude123koon139Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: con was talking about state crap and me my self think pokemon sucks look at the original debates I have with pokemon
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
legodude123koon139Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro pointed out lots of problems with pokemon.