The Instigator
PonyGirl
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points
The Contender
TheGamer1998
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

There are only two types of eclipses

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
PonyGirl
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/20/2013 Category: Science
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,060 times Debate No: 33932
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

PonyGirl

Pro

I think that there are only two types of eclipses. Therefore I am going pro for this debate. I believe there are only two eclipses. Scientists only belive there are two eclipse. And I will prove it in the next round.
TheGamer1998

Con

You must really like debating against me, I believe this as well, but there may be more that have not shown yet
Debate Round No. 1
PonyGirl

Pro

It shows in a science book that there are only two. If there were more eclipses they would've wrote them but they didn't. It wasn't a mistake. I know that there are only two. The name of the book is : the big book of knowledge it says there are only two eclipses on pg. 115 in the section called the universe. The subtitle is planet earth
TheGamer1998

Con

That's only what we know so far, there is much more to the universe, therefore, many other eclipses as well
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by MattHarrison 4 years ago
MattHarrison
I am not going to vote because I believe this debate is pointless. However, I will send, "TheGamer1998," a debate on wether Skrillex is really music. If you are not to busy watching "wreck it Ralph" or reading "Percy Jackson." I think I will vote on this one regardless.
Posted by PonyGirl 4 years ago
PonyGirl
Oh I don't like debating you. You're ok at it but I'm really competitive as you know and the last debate we had together we had a tie. And I felt sad thy we did so I want to debate u again and win this time. :)
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by MattHarrison 4 years ago
MattHarrison
PonyGirlTheGamer1998Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Wow, my debate was pointless? At least Pro had an argument. Con really did not bring up shadows? That really is all that an eclipse is, and you admit you are wrong in the first round Con. This one goes to Pro.
Vote Placed by BennyW 4 years ago
BennyW
PonyGirlTheGamer1998Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Weak debate. Pro made some sort of arument and mentioned a source but weather it exists or not i can't say. Since Con never actually debated anything and even acknowledged the resolution in the first round it goes to pro.
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
PonyGirlTheGamer1998Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: con had no actual arguments and in fact only gave pure wild speculation that there are more then two types of eclipses rather then any hard evidence, so arguments immediately go to the pro