The Instigator
atheistman
Pro (for)
Winning
32 Points
The Contender
diety
Con (against)
Losing
7 Points

There is No God

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/13/2009 Category: Religion
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 687 times Debate No: 8616
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (6)

 

atheistman

Pro

There is no evidence of a god, and there has never has been any evidence, only faith (wishful thinking). It is also physically impossible for a god to exist.
diety

Con

Thank you

The existence of god is unknown, making it unfalsifiable. You can't ever prove that there is no god.
Debate Round No. 1
atheistman

Pro

Yes you can disprove that a god exists, because it is physically impossible for a god to exist. What did he exist on before he created the universe? If he can judge, see, hear, think, control, among many other human-like qualities, and is even in the image of man, then he must be a living thing. If all living things die, then how is he immortal? How does he hear prayers if he's not on earth, and doesn't have ears, which would make him a living thing? How does he have the time to listen to prayers, judge people, and maintain order all at once?
diety

Con

diety forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
atheistman

Pro

atheistman forfeited this round.
diety

Con

Oh lawd please bless me with a win.
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by atheistman 7 years ago
atheistman
Everything in the universe is made up of atoms, there is nothing beyond the universe.
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
However, diety never pointed this out.

I would have voted for diety if he actually countered things with his last round. However, he didn't.
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
Metaphysical means "beyond/above" the physical universe. Supernatural. God isn't made of atoms, silly.
Posted by atheistman 7 years ago
atheistman
The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree is a silly way oh thinking.
Posted by atheistman 7 years ago
atheistman
Metaphysical?
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
Atheists believe that it is possible for the physical to have no creator, but not the metaphysical... such a silly way of thinking.
Posted by atheistman 7 years ago
atheistman
So true, it might as well be saying that the flying spaghetti monster can't be proven or disproven, or a chair can't be proven or disproven.
Posted by TheSkeptic 7 years ago
TheSkeptic
Agnosticism is such a silly position - a wannabe third position.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Kikematsu 6 years ago
Kikematsu
atheistmandietyTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Awed 7 years ago
Awed
atheistmandietyTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by patsox834 7 years ago
patsox834
atheistmandietyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
atheistmandietyTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Vote Placed by TheSkeptic 7 years ago
TheSkeptic
atheistmandietyTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by atheistman 7 years ago
atheistman
atheistmandietyTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70