There is a conspiracy to ethnically cleanse white people in Europe, America and Australia
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
InVinoVeritas
| Started: | 5/13/2012 | Category: | News |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 743 times | Debate No: | 23583 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (4)
 Pro - They are told that opposing their replacement is a psychological disease called RACISM. White advocates are demonized. The same media glorify african, jewish or muslim ethnic identities. The target seems to be white identity only  Con |
 |
|
Pro After all, my intention is not to win a debate a format, but to get this idea across: MAY BE MULTICULTURISM IS NOT GOOD FOR EUROPEANS AT ALL?? Or may be it is not enough evidence?: Con Why is multiculturalism not good for Europeans? Because of your video that states that there are extremist Muslim rapists in Norway? That means that multiculturalism is, all in all, bad? Really...? I wonder if my opponent will actually argue his case. |
 |
|
Pro Ask all the victims of the "race relations" law, speaking against multiculturalism can lead to jail and fines. the BNP was forced to change its constitution to become multi-culti or face fines "there are extremist Muslim rapists in Norway?" They would not even be there in Norway if it was not for multiculturalism. Those women are VICTIMS of multiculturalism, they didnt have to be raped, there was no need!! Con That's not true at all. Freedom of Speech. This example of multipleculturalism (i.e., radical Muslims in Norway) has led to negative conflicts. Therefore, all multiculturalism is bad. The opponent has shown no evidence relating to the resolution about a "conspiracy." I don't even know what he is trying to get across now. |
 |
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by JacobHession 1 year ago
| Pegasus | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Clear Con victory.
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 1 year ago
| Pegasus | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: A conspiracy requires that people consciously work together to achieve a specific purpose, in this case ethnic cleansing. Pro did not offer a trace of evidence of coordination to achieve the goal. Many people promote multi-culturalism as a good in itself, but they do not conspire for ethnic cleansing by any stretch of the imagination.
Vote Placed by frozen_eclipse 1 year ago
| Pegasus | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: pro hasnt proved his argument at all. His source is irrelevant so sources are tied.
Vote Placed by Travniki 1 year ago
| Pegasus | InVinoVeritas | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a BOP to show us a conspiracy, and he argued that the media hates whites, and gave no evidence
1) Increase of rapes of london, Norway, Sweden
2) Increase of gang violence and maras in South California and other places that have imported millions of immigrants
3) Importation of terrorists and conflicts from other countries, leading to terrorist attacks that would have not happened otherwise
4) As the white percent of population lowers, the crime rises: See paris and Detroit
5) Enforced multiculturalism and the prohibition of segregation in America have had a terrible consequence for white women: 30 000 white women have been raped by blacks every year. There are basically no cases of the other way around (statistics from FBI, Color of Crime)
also you seem to have no idea of what the race-relations act is, europe does not have freedom of speech
While America may have some more, asking Derbyshire from National Review what happens if you talk against multiculturalism
YEP. You get fired
The facts that there are no good results coming from multiculturism, yet it is enforced as law, shows that there are some sinister motives behind it
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOJubxHYt4Q
but the filter removed it