There is evidence to show that 9/11 was stage by the government
Debate Rounds (3)
Con may just accept or argue during round 1. His choice :)
A lot of the "evidence" I have found actually comes from a misinterpretation of science. The form of research on which these theories are based on are also rather flawed. Thomas D. Eager states that they use the "reverse scientific method," in which they come to a conclusion and toss out all the evidence that doesn't support that conclusion. With such a major tragedy, there are going to be people who want to believe that great tragedies have great causes, which is just not the case most of the time.
Also, if you look up all the conspiracies, you will see that there are several theories, all with "evidence" backing it up. Now, does that mean all these theories are true? Certainly not. These conspiracies take advantage of the small holes in the explanations and witness sightings and etc. to base these theories on. You can't base a whole theory on a witness sighting and a snippet of often exaggerated information.
The biggest flaw in those conspiracies is the fact that they don't give credit to all the other evidence. They simply use the evidence that supports their theory and ignore the larger pieces of evidence that contradicts it. Also, this was a rather large tragedy, and there are always going to be misconceptions and confusion with these kind of things. One misplaced word could set off another conspiracy theory.
So let us use common logic. When you believe in the Illuminati Brittany spears shaves her head. When Brittany spears shaves her head she makes crappy songs. When She makes crappy songs terrorist get mad. When terrorist get mad they try to contact the us. When they try to contact the US, the US asks them to bomb the twin towers. When they bomb the towers George Bush cries.
Don't make George Bush cry. Vote Pro
Also during the 9/11 bombing we can see the plane being detonated before it hits the towers itself.
It does no matter what video you use, you will always see the flash of light. Also if you zoom in on that image it shows a missile attached to the bottom of the plane. In addition to those two facts, we can also see that the windows of the plane were closed. This is suppose to be a civilian aircraft. If this plane was hijacked, why would there be military shutters over the windows? The main point to pay attention to is the bright flash of light before it hits the tower. Common sense shows us this is an explosion with the plane. If it were random and no detonated, this would have to do with the fuel lines and would have occurred exactly 15 feet back from the front of the plane, the explosion would have been near the wedge in the passengers cock pick and the seating area. The only logical explanation was that there was bombs in the front side of the plane. Breaking this down with common sense, if terrorist got bombs on the plane. It was not a lax in security, it was planned. No one could bring that type of C4 or bomb on the plane without being caught. As you can tell the explosion would be roughly equivalent to a car blowing up.
So remember, don't make George bush cry and order direct tv. Vote pro
goldenflaws forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.