The Instigator
Inductivelogic
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
goldenflaws
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

There is evidence to show that 9/11 was stage by the government

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/19/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 600 times Debate No: 35780
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Inductivelogic

Pro

Con may just accept or argue during round 1. His choice :)
goldenflaws

Con

I accept. :)
A lot of the "evidence" I have found actually comes from a misinterpretation of science. The form of research on which these theories are based on are also rather flawed. Thomas D. Eager states that they use the "reverse scientific method," in which they come to a conclusion and toss out all the evidence that doesn't support that conclusion. With such a major tragedy, there are going to be people who want to believe that great tragedies have great causes, which is just not the case most of the time.
Also, if you look up all the conspiracies, you will see that there are several theories, all with "evidence" backing it up. Now, does that mean all these theories are true? Certainly not. These conspiracies take advantage of the small holes in the explanations and witness sightings and etc. to base these theories on. You can't base a whole theory on a witness sighting and a snippet of often exaggerated information.
The biggest flaw in those conspiracies is the fact that they don't give credit to all the other evidence. They simply use the evidence that supports their theory and ignore the larger pieces of evidence that contradicts it. Also, this was a rather large tragedy, and there are always going to be misconceptions and confusion with these kind of things. One misplaced word could set off another conspiracy theory.
Debate Round No. 1
Inductivelogic

Pro

Hello and welcome to the danger zone. I would first like to start out by saying the Illuminati is real. We know this by multiple facts. There symbol which is a weird looking triangle can be seen throughout multiple videos.

So let us use common logic. When you believe in the Illuminati Brittany spears shaves her head. When Brittany spears shaves her head she makes crappy songs. When She makes crappy songs terrorist get mad. When terrorist get mad they try to contact the us. When they try to contact the US, the US asks them to bomb the twin towers. When they bomb the towers George Bush cries.

Don't make George Bush cry. Vote Pro
goldenflaws

Con

First off, Britney Spears shaved her head in February of 2007 to avoid having it drug tested. And 9/11 occurred in 2001. That being said, I'm simply not following your line of thinking. Also, these "facts" you speak of are not solid enough to conclude that the Illuminati is real. I don't know much about the Illuminati, but are you suggesting that the Illuminati caused 9/11, not the government? Or are you suggesting that the Illuminati and the government is one and the same? If it is the former, doesn't this make your claim completely invalid?
Debate Round No. 2
Inductivelogic

Pro

The Illuminati is within the government and within us. When you close your eyes, you are one with the Illuminati. It is a sense of being that has led to powerful organizations running the US. It is a proven fact that each president must join them.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...

Also during the 9/11 bombing we can see the plane being detonated before it hits the towers itself.

It does no matter what video you use, you will always see the flash of light. Also if you zoom in on that image it shows a missile attached to the bottom of the plane. In addition to those two facts, we can also see that the windows of the plane were closed. This is suppose to be a civilian aircraft. If this plane was hijacked, why would there be military shutters over the windows? The main point to pay attention to is the bright flash of light before it hits the tower. Common sense shows us this is an explosion with the plane. If it were random and no detonated, this would have to do with the fuel lines and would have occurred exactly 15 feet back from the front of the plane, the explosion would have been near the wedge in the passengers cock pick and the seating area. The only logical explanation was that there was bombs in the front side of the plane. Breaking this down with common sense, if terrorist got bombs on the plane. It was not a lax in security, it was planned. No one could bring that type of C4 or bomb on the plane without being caught. As you can tell the explosion would be roughly equivalent to a car blowing up.

So remember, don't make George bush cry and order direct tv. Vote pro
goldenflaws

Con

goldenflaws forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.